The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Design principles of chemical penetration enhancers for transdermal drug delivery
Open accessAbstract
Chemical penetration enhancers (CPEs) are present in a large number of transdermal, dermatological, and cosmetic products to aid dermal absorption of curatives and aesthetics. This wide spectrum of use is based on only a handful of molecules, the majority of which belong to three to four typical chemical functionalities, sporadically introduced as CPEs in the last 50 years. Using >100 CPEs representing several chemical functionalities, we report on the fundamental mechanisms that determine the barrier disruption potential of CPEs and skin safety in their presence. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy studies revealed that regardless of their chemical make-up, CPEs perturb the skin barrier via extraction or fluidization of lipid bilayers. Irritation response of CPEs, on the other hand, correlated with the denaturation of stratum corneum proteins, making it feasible to use protein conformation changes to map CPE safety in vitro . Most interestingly, the understanding of underlying molecular forces responsible for CPE safety and potency reveals inherent constraints that limit CPE performance. Reengineering this knowledge back into molecular structure, we designed >300 potential CPEs. These molecules were screened in silico and subsequently tested in vitro for molecular delivery. These molecules significantly broaden the repertoire of CPEs that can aid the design of optimized transdermal, dermatological, and cosmetic formulations in the future.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Intracellular Delivery by Membrane Disruption: Mechanisms, Strategies, and Concepts
Stewart, M. P., Langer, R., & Jensen, K. F. (2018) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00678 · Cited by 747
Microfluidic Devices for Bioapplications
Yeo, L. Y., Chang, H., Chan, P. P. Y., & Friend, J. R. (2011) · Small · doi:10.1002/smll.201000946 · Cited by 622
Overcoming the Stratum Corneum: The Modulation of Skin Penetration
Trommer, H., & Neubert, R. H. H. (2006) · Skin Pharmacology and Physiology · doi:10.1159/000091978 · Cited by 572
Permeation enhancers in transdermal drug delivery: benefits and limitations
Kováčik, A., Kopečná, M., & Vávrová, K. (2020) · Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery · doi:10.1080/17425247.2020.1713087 · Cited by 369
Recent advances of controlled drug delivery using microfluidic platforms
Sanjay, S. T., Zhou, W., Dou, M., Tavakoli, H., Ma, L., Xu, F., & Li, X. (2018) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2017.09.013 · Cited by 365
Metadata
- Authors
- Karande, P., Jain, A., Ergun, K., Kispersky, V., & Mitragotri, S.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2005-03-17
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 4688-4693
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2046667253
- Cited by
- 399
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Design principles of chemical penetration enhancers for transdermal drug delivery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0501176102
- The paper
- Karande, P., Jain, A., Ergun, K., Kispersky, V., & Mitragotri, S. (2005). Design principles of chemical penetration enhancers for transdermal drug delivery. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0501176102
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.