The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparative transcriptomics of rice reveals an ancient pattern of response to microbial colonization
Open accessAbstract
Glomalean fungi induce and colonize symbiotic tissue called arbuscular mycorrhiza on the roots of most land plants. Other fungi also colonize plants but cause disease not symbiosis. Whole-transcriptome analysis using a custom-designed Affymetrix Gene-Chip and confirmation with real-time RT-PCR revealed 224 genes affected during arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. We compared these transcription profiles with those from rice roots that were colonized by pathogens ( Magnaporthe grisea and Fusarium moniliforme ). Over 40% of genes showed differential regulation caused by both the symbiotic and at least one of the pathogenic interactions. A set of genes was similarly expressed in all three associations, revealing a conserved response to fungal colonization. The responses that were shared between pathogen and symbiont infection may play a role in compatibility. Likewise, the responses that are different may cause disease. Some of the genes that respond to mycorrhizal colonization may be involved in the uptake of phosphate. Indeed, phosphate addition mimicked the effect of mycorrhiza on 8% of the tested genes. We found that 34% of the mycorrhiza-associated rice genes were also associated with mycorrhiza in dicots, revealing a conserved pattern of response between the two angiosperm classes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana
Initiative, T. A. G. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35048692 · Cited by 9,301
Plant infection and the establishment of fungal biotrophy
Mendgen, K., & Hahn, M. (2002) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/s1360-1385(02)02297-5 · Cited by 468
Cited by
Mycorrhiza-Induced Resistance and Priming of Plant Defenses
Jung, S. C., Martinez-Medina, A., Lopez-Raez, J. A., & Pozo, M. J. (2012) · Journal of Chemical Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10886-012-0134-6 · Cited by 1,019
Functional biology of plant phosphate uptake at root and mycorrhiza interfaces
Bucher, M. (2007) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01935.x · Cited by 718
Jasmonate signaling in plant interactions with resistance-inducing beneficial microbes
Van der Ent, S., Van Wees, S. C. M., & Pieterse, C. M. J. (2009) · Phytochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.phytochem.2009.06.009 · Cited by 443
Further advances in orchid mycorrhizal research
Dearnaley, J. D. W. (2007) · Mycorrhiza · doi:10.1007/s00572-007-0138-1 · Cited by 346
Amprayn, K.-O., Rose, M. T., Kecskés, M., Pereg, L., Nguyen, H. T., & Kennedy, I. R. (2012) · Applied Soil Ecology · doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2011.11.009 · Cited by 198
Metadata
- Authors
- Güimil, S., Chang, H.-S., Zhu, T., Sesma, A., Osbourn, A., Roux, C., Ioannidis, V., Oakeley, E. J., Docquier, M., Descombes, P., Briggs, S. P., & Paszkowski, U.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2005-05-19
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 8066-8070
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2126312752
- Cited by
- 367
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 23.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative transcriptomics of rice reveals an ancient pattern of response to microbial colonization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0502999102
- The paper
- Güimil, S., Chang, H.-S., Zhu, T., Sesma, A., Osbourn, A., Roux, C., Ioannidis, V., Oakeley, E. J., Docquier, M., Descombes, P., Briggs, S. P., & Paszkowski, U. (2005). Comparative transcriptomics of rice reveals an ancient pattern of response to microbial colonization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0502999102
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.