Cited by 96Estrogen and related hormone effectsBreast Lesions and CarcinomasCancer Risks and Factors

Rat strain-specific actions of 17β-estradiol in the mammary gland: Correlation between estrogen-induced lobuloalveolar hyperplasia and susceptibility to estrogen-induced mammary cancers

Open access
Harvell, Djuana M. E., Strecker, Tracy E., Tochacek, Martin, Xie, Benjamin, Pennington, Karen L., McComb, Rodney D., Roy, Shyamal K., Shull, James D.·2000·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The genetically related ACI and Copenhagen (COP) rat strains display diametrically opposed susceptibilities to mammary cancer development when treated chronically with 17beta-estradiol (E2). Here, we compare the actions of E2 on cell proliferation and lobuloalveolar development in the mammary glands of female ACI and COP rats. After 12 wk of E2 treatment, the mammary glands of ACI rats exhibited a significantly greater proliferative response to E2, compared with COP rats, as evidenced by quantification of S phase fraction and development of lobuloalveolar hyperplasia. Focal regions of atypical epithelial hyperplasia were observed in ACI, but not COP, rats. These strain differences were not because of differences in circulating E2, progesterone or, prolactin. Two-thirds of the induced mammary cancers in ACI rats exhibited aneuploidy. The E2-induced mammary cancers regressed when hormone treatment was discontinued, indicating that they were estrogen-dependent. Progesterone receptor was expressed by the great majority of epithelial cells within the E2-induced atypical hyperplastic foci and the mammary carcinomas, suggesting a link between these lesions. These data demonstrate a correlation between E2 action in the induction of mammary cell proliferation and atypical epithelial hyperplasia and genetically conferred susceptibility to E2-induced mammary cancers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.050569097

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 44 · Cited by 96

Authors
Harvell, D. M. E., Strecker, T. E., Tochacek, M., Xie, B., Pennington, K. L., McComb, R. D., Roy, S. K., & Shull, J. D.
Affiliations
University of Nebraska Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Shull, James D.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2000-02-25
Volume
97
Issue
6
Pages
2779-2784
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2160046059
Cited by
96
References
44
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • American Institute for Cancer Research
  • National Institutes of Health (P30CA36727)
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA068529, R01CA77876, R01CA077876, R01CA68529, P30CA036727, T32CA009476, P-30CA-36727)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Risks and Factors
Keywords
estradiol, mammary gland, ACI rats, Copenhagen rat, strain differences, mammary cell proliferation, atypical epithelial hyperplasia, aneuploidy, progesterone receptor, mammary carcinogenesis
MeSH terms
Animals, Disease Susceptibility, Estradiol, Female, Flow Cytometry, Hyperplasia, Hyperprolactinemia, Immunohistochemistry, Mammary Glands, Animal, Pituitary Gland, Progesterone, Rats, Inbred ACI, Receptors, Progesterone, Species Specificity, Time Factors, Mammary Neoplasms, Animal, S Phase, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review