The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A microscopic view of miniprotein folding: Enhanced folding efficiency through formation of an intermediate
Open accessAbstract
The role of polypeptide collapse and formation of intermediates in protein folding is still under debate. Miniproteins, small globular peptide structures, serve as ideal model systems to study the basic principles that govern folding. Experimental investigations of folding dynamics of such small systems, however, turn out to be challenging, because requirements for high temporal and spatial resolution have to be met simultaneously. Here, we demonstrate how selective quenching of an extrinsic fluorescent label by the amino acid tryptophan (Trp) can be used to probe folding dynamics of Trp-cage (TC), the smallest protein known to date. Using fluorescence correlation spectroscopy, we monitor folding transitions as well as conformational flexibility in the denatured state of the 20-residue protein under thermodynamic equilibrium conditions with nanosecond time resolution. Besides microsecond folding kinetics, we reveal hierarchical folding of TC, hidden to previous experimental studies. We show that specific collapse of the peptide to a molten globule-like intermediate enhances folding efficiency considerably. A single point mutation destabilizes the intermediate, switching the protein to two-state folding behavior and slowing down the folding process. Our results underscore the importance of preformed structure in the denatured state for folding of even the smallest globular structures. A unique method emerges for monitoring conformational dynamics and ultrafast folding events of polypeptides at the nanometer scale.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Protein folding and misfolding
Dobson, C. M. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02261 · Cited by 4,791
Designing a 20-residue protein
Neidigh, J. W., Fesinmeyer, R. M., & Andersen, N. H. (2002) · Nature Structural Biology · doi:10.1038/nsb798 · Cited by 793
Cited by
Markov models of molecular kinetics: Generation and validation
Prinz, J.-H., Wu, H., Sarich, M., Keller, B., Senne, M., Held, M., Chodera, J. D., Schütte, C., & Noé, F. (2011) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.3565032 · Cited by 1,275
Photophysical processes in single molecule organic fluorescent probes
Stennett, E. M. S., Ciuba, M. A., & Levitus, M. (2014) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c3cs60211g · Cited by 323
Shot-Noise Limited Single-Molecule FRET Histograms: Comparison between Theory and Experiments
Nir, E., Michalet, X., Hamadani, K. M., Laurence, T. A., Neuhauser, D., Kovchegov, Y., & Weiss, S. (2006) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp063483n · Cited by 314
Deng, N.-J., Dai, W., & Levy, R. M. (2013) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp401962k · Cited by 64
Prinz, J.-H., Chodera, J. D., Pande, V. S., Swope, W. C., Smith, J. C., & Noé, F. (2011) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.3592153 · Cited by 52
Metadata
- Authors
- Neuweiler, H., Doose, S., & Sauer, M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2005-11-03
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 46
- Pages
- 16650-16655
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2056975402
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A microscopic view of miniprotein folding: Enhanced folding efficiency through formation of an intermediate. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0507351102
- The paper
- Neuweiler, H., Doose, S., & Sauer, M. (2005). A microscopic view of miniprotein folding: Enhanced folding efficiency through formation of an intermediate. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507351102
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.