The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Structural changes involved in protein binding correlate with intrinsic motions of proteins in the unbound state
Open accessAbstract
Protein–protein binding usually involves structural changes that may extend beyond the rearrangements on a local scale, and cannot be explained by a classical lock-and-key mechanism. Several models have been advanced to explain the flexible binding of proteins such as the induced fit mechanism where the ligand is postulated to induce a conformational change at the interaction site upon binding, or the preexisting equilibrium hypothesis that assumes that protein samples an ensemble of conformations at equilibrium conditions and that the ligand binds selectively to an active conformation. We explored the equilibrium motions of proteins that exhibit relatively large (nonlocal) conformational changes upon protein binding using the Gaussian network model and the anisotropic network model of protein dynamics. For four complexes, LIR-1/HLA-A2, Actin/DNase I, CDK2/cyclin, and CDK6/p16 INK4a , the motions calculated for the monomer exhibiting the largest conformational change, in its unbound (free) form, correlate with the experimentally observed structural changes upon binding. This study emphasizes the preexisting equilibrium/conformational selection as a mechanism for protein–protein interaction and lends support the concept that proteins, in their native conformation, are predisposed to undergo conformational fluctuations that are relevant to, or even required for, their biological functions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
From Levinthal to pathways to funnels
Dill, K. A., & Chan, H. S. (1997) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsb0197-10 · Cited by 2,293
Folding funnels, binding funnels, and protein function
Tsai, C., Kumar, S., Ma, B., & Nussinov, R. (1999) · Protein Science · doi:10.1110/ps.8.6.1181 · Cited by 648
Folding funnels and binding mechanisms
Ma, B., Kumar, S., Tsai, C.-J., & Nussinov, R. (1999) · Protein Engineering, Design and Selection · doi:10.1093/protein/12.9.713 · Cited by 594
Cited by
The role of dynamic conformational ensembles in biomolecular recognition
Boehr, D. D., Nussinov, R., & Wright, P. E. (2009) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio.232 · Cited by 2,008
Global dynamics of proteins: bridging between structure and function
Bahar, I., Lezon, T. R., Yang, L.-W., & Eyal, E. (2010) · Annual Review of Biophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.biophys.093008.131258 · Cited by 610
Self-citationAllostery in Its Many Disguises: From Theory to Applications
Wodak, S. J., Paci, E., Dokholyan, N. V., Berezovsky, I. N., Horovitz, A., Li, J., Hilser, V. J., Bahar, I., Karanicolas, J., Stock, G., et al. (2019) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2019.01.003 · Cited by 404
Self-citationIntrinsic dynamics of enzymes in the unbound state and relation to allosteric regulation
Bahar, I., Chennubhotla, C., & Tobi, D. (2007) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2007.09.011 · Cited by 306
Self-citationDynamic Allostery: Linkers Are Not Merely Flexible
Ma, B., Tsai, C.-J., Haliloğlu, T., & Nussinov, R. (2011) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2011.06.002 · Cited by 222
Metadata
- Authors
- Tobi, D., & Bahar, I.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2005-12-14
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 52
- Pages
- 18908-18913
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2108196145
- Cited by
- 379
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 7.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Structural changes involved in protein binding correlate with intrinsic motions of proteins in the unbound state. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0507603102
- The paper
- Tobi, D., & Bahar, I. (2005). Structural changes involved in protein binding correlate with intrinsic motions of proteins in the unbound state. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507603102
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.