Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 322

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparative gene expression analysis of blood and brain provides concurrent validation of SELENBP1 up-regulation in schizophrenia

Open access
Glatt, Stephen J., Everall, Ian P., Kremen, William S., Corbeil, Jacques, Šášik, Roman, Khanlou, Negar, Han, Mark, Liew, Choong-Chin, Tsuang, Ming T.·2005·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Microarray techniques hold great promise for identifying risk factors for schizophrenia (SZ) but have not yet generated widely reproducible results due to methodological differences between studies and the high risk of type I inferential errors. Here we established a protocol for conservative analysis and interpretation of gene expression data from the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex of SZ patients using statistical and bioinformatic methods that limit false positives. We also compared brain gene expression profiles with those from peripheral blood cells of a separate sample of SZ patients to identify disease-associated genes that generalize across tissues and populations and further substantiate the use of gene expression profiling of blood for detecting valid SZ biomarkers. Implementing this systematic approach, we: ( i ) discovered 177 putative SZ risk genes in brain, 28 of which map to linked chromosomal loci; ( ii ) delineated six biological processes and 12 molecular functions that may be particularly disrupted in the illness; ( iii ) identified 123 putative SZ biomarkers in blood, 6 of which ( BTG1 , GSK3A , HLA-DRB1 , HNRPA3 , SELENBP1 , and SFRS1 ) had corresponding differential expression in brain; ( iv ) verified the differential expression of the strongest candidate SZ biomarker ( SELENBP1 ) in blood; and ( v ) demonstrated neuronal and glial expression of SELENBP1 protein in brain. The continued application of this approach in other brain regions and populations should facilitate the discovery of highly reliable and reproducible candidate risk genes and biomarkers for SZ. The identification of valid peripheral biomarkers for SZ may ultimately facilitate early identification, intervention, and prevention efforts as well.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0507666102

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 322

Metadata

Authors
Glatt, S. J., Everall, I. P., Kremen, W. S., Corbeil, J., Šášik, R., Khanlou, N., Han, M., Liew, C.-C., & Tsuang, M. T.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2005-10-13
Volume
102
Issue
43
Pages
15533-15538
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2016441589
Cited by
322
References
2
FWCI
10.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative gene expression analysis of blood and brain provides concurrent validation of SELENBP1 up-regulation in schizophrenia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0507666102
The paper
Glatt, S. J., Everall, I. P., Kremen, W. S., Corbeil, J., Šášik, R., Khanlou, N., Han, M., Liew, C.-C., & Tsuang, M. T. (2005). Comparative gene expression analysis of blood and brain provides concurrent validation of SELENBP1 up-regulation in schizophrenia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507666102

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.