Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 222

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Probing structural heterogeneities and fluctuations of nucleic acids and denatured proteins

Open access
Laurence, Ted A., Kong, Xiangxu, Jäger, Marcus, Weiss, Shimon·2005·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

We study protein and nucleic acid structure and dynamics using single-molecule FRET and alternating-laser excitation. Freely diffusing molecules are sorted into subpopulations based on single-molecule signals detected within 100 μs to 1 ms. Distance distributions caused by fluctuations faster than 100 μs are studied within these subpopulations by using time-correlated single-photon counting. Measured distance distributions for dsDNA can be accounted for by considering fluorophore linkers and fluorophore rotational diffusion, except that we find smaller fluctuations for internally labeled dsDNA than DNA with one of the fluorophores positioned at a terminal site. We find that the electrostatic portion of the persistence length of short single-stranded poly(dT) varies approximately as the ionic strength ( I ) to the –1/2 power ( I –1/2 ), and that the average contribution to the contour length per base is 0.40–0.45 nm. We study unfolded chymotrypsin inhibitor 2 (CI2) and unfolded acyl-CoA binding protein (ACBP) even under conditions where folded and unfolded subpopulations coexist (contributions from folded proteins are excluded by using alternating-laser excitation). At lower denaturant concentrations, unfolded CI2 and ACBP are more compact and display larger fluctuations than at higher denaturant concentrations where only unfolded proteins are present. The experimentally measured fluctuations are larger than the fluctuations predicted from a Gaussian chain model or a wormlike chain model. We propose that the larger fluctuations may indicate transient residual structure in the unfolded state.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0508584102

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 222

Metadata

Authors
Laurence, T. A., Kong, X., Jäger, M., & Weiss, S.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2005-11-15
Volume
102
Issue
48
Pages
17348-17353
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2160134999
Cited by
222
References
1
FWCI
6.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Probing structural heterogeneities and fluctuations of nucleic acids and denatured proteins. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0508584102
The paper
Laurence, T. A., Kong, X., Jäger, M., & Weiss, S. (2005). Probing structural heterogeneities and fluctuations of nucleic acids and denatured proteins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0508584102

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.