The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Probing structural heterogeneities and fluctuations of nucleic acids and denatured proteins
Open accessAbstract
We study protein and nucleic acid structure and dynamics using single-molecule FRET and alternating-laser excitation. Freely diffusing molecules are sorted into subpopulations based on single-molecule signals detected within 100 μs to 1 ms. Distance distributions caused by fluctuations faster than 100 μs are studied within these subpopulations by using time-correlated single-photon counting. Measured distance distributions for dsDNA can be accounted for by considering fluorophore linkers and fluorophore rotational diffusion, except that we find smaller fluctuations for internally labeled dsDNA than DNA with one of the fluorophores positioned at a terminal site. We find that the electrostatic portion of the persistence length of short single-stranded poly(dT) varies approximately as the ionic strength ( I ) to the –1/2 power ( I –1/2 ), and that the average contribution to the contour length per base is 0.40–0.45 nm. We study unfolded chymotrypsin inhibitor 2 (CI2) and unfolded acyl-CoA binding protein (ACBP) even under conditions where folded and unfolded subpopulations coexist (contributions from folded proteins are excluded by using alternating-laser excitation). At lower denaturant concentrations, unfolded CI2 and ACBP are more compact and display larger fluctuations than at higher denaturant concentrations where only unfolded proteins are present. The experimentally measured fluctuations are larger than the fluctuations predicted from a Gaussian chain model or a wormlike chain model. We propose that the larger fluctuations may indicate transient residual structure in the unfolded state.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
From Levinthal to pathways to funnels
Dill, K. A., & Chan, H. S. (1997) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsb0197-10 · Cited by 2,293
Cited by
Dill, K. A., Ozkan, S. B., Shell, M. S., & Weikl, T. R. (2008) · Annual Review of Biophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.biophys.37.092707.153558 · Cited by 1,163
Shot-Noise Limited Single-Molecule FRET Histograms: Comparison between Theory and Experiments
Nir, E., Michalet, X., Hamadani, K. M., Laurence, T. A., Neuhauser, D., Kovchegov, Y., & Weiss, S. (2006) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp063483n · Cited by 314
Self-citationCoordinate-dependent diffusion in protein folding
Best, R. B., & Hummer, G. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0910390107 · Cited by 289
Accurate Single-Molecule FRET Studies Using Multiparameter Fluorescence Detection
Sisamakis, E., Valeri, A., Kalinin, S., Rothwell, P. J., & Seidel, C. A. M. (2010) · Methods in Enzymology · doi:10.1016/s0076-6879(10)75018-7 · Cited by 268
Voelz, V. A., Jäger, M., Yao, S., Chen, Y., Zhu, L., Waldauer, S. A., Bowman, G. R., Friedrichs, M., Bakajin, O., Lapidus, L. J., et al. (2012) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja302528z · Cited by 140
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Laurence, T. A., Kong, X., Jäger, M., & Weiss, S.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2005-11-15
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 48
- Pages
- 17348-17353
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2160134999
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Probing structural heterogeneities and fluctuations of nucleic acids and denatured proteins. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0508584102
- The paper
- Laurence, T. A., Kong, X., Jäger, M., & Weiss, S. (2005). Probing structural heterogeneities and fluctuations of nucleic acids and denatured proteins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0508584102
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.