The DOI matches its Crossref record.
l-Tartaric acid synthesis from vitamin C in higher plants
Abstract
The biosynthetic pathway of l-tartaric acid, the form most commonly encountered in nature, and its catabolic ties to vitamin C, remain a challenge to plant scientists. Vitamin C and l-tartaric acid are plant-derived metabolites with intrinsic human value. In contrast to most fruits during development, grapes accumulate l-tartaric acid, which remains within the berry throughout ripening. Berry taste and the organoleptic properties and aging potential of wines are intimately linked to levels of l-tartaric acid present in the fruit, and those added during vinification. Elucidation of the reactions relating l-tartaric acid to vitamin C catabolism in the Vitaceae showed that they proceed via the oxidation of l-idonic acid, the proposed rate-limiting step in the pathway. Here we report the use of transcript and metabolite profiling to identify candidate cDNAs from genes expressed at developmental times and in tissues appropriate for l-tartaric acid biosynthesis in grape berries. Enzymological analyses of one candidate confirmed its activity in the proposed rate-limiting step of the direct pathway from vitamin C to tartaric acid in higher plants. Surveying organic acid content in Vitis and related genera, we have identified a non-tartrate-forming species in which this gene is deleted. This species accumulates in excess of three times the levels of vitamin C than comparably ripe berries of tartrate-accumulating species, suggesting that modulation of tartaric acid biosynthesis may provide a rational basis for the production of grapes rich in vitamin C.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ascorbic acid metabolism and functions: A comparison of plants and mammals
Smirnoff, N. (2018) · Free Radical Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2018.03.033 · Cited by 667
In Posidonia oceanica cadmium induces changes in DNA methylation and chromatin patterning
Greco, M., Chiappetta, A., Bruno, L., & Bitonti, M. B. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/err313 · Cited by 538
Transcriptomic and metabolite analyses of Cabernet Sauvignon grape berry development
Deluc, L. G., Grimplet, J., Wheatley, M. D., Tillett, R. L., Quilici, D. R., Osborne, C., Schooley, D. A., Schlauch, K. A., Cushman, J. C., & Cramer, G. R. (2007) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/1471-2164-8-429 · Cited by 462
Extreme heat reduces and shifts United States premium wine production in the 21st century
White, M. A., Diffenbaugh, N. S., Jones, G. V., Pal, J. S., & Giorgi, F. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0603230103 · Cited by 366
Vitamin C Content in Fruits: Biosynthesis and Regulation
Fenech, M., Amaya, I., Valpuesta, V., & Botella, M. A. (2019) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.02006 · Cited by 355
Metadata
- Authors
- DeBolt, S., Cook, D. R., & Ford, C. M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2006-04-04
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 5608-5613
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1996641651
- Cited by
- 213
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: l-Tartaric acid synthesis from vitamin C in higher plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0510864103
- The paper
- DeBolt, S., Cook, D. R., & Ford, C. M. (2006). l-Tartaric acid synthesis from vitamin C in higher plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0510864103
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.