Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 186

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An efficient rapid system for profiling the cellular activities of molecular libraries

Open access
Melnick, Jonathan S., Janes, Jeff, Kim, Sungjoon, Chang, Jim Y., Sipes, Daniel G., Gunderson, Drew, Jarnes, Laura, Matzen, Jason T., Garcia, Michael E., Hood, Tami L., Beigi, Ronak, Xia, Gang, Harig, Richard A., Asatryan, Hayk, Yan, S. Frank, Zhou, Yingyao, Gu, Xiang-Ju, Saadat, Alham, Zhou, Vicki, King, Frederick J., Shaw, Christopher M., Su, Andrew I., Downs, Robert, Gray, Nathanael S., Schultz, Peter G., Warmuth, Markus, Caldwell, Jeremy S.·2006·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Rapid quantitative methods for characterizing small molecules, peptides, proteins, or RNAs in a broad array of cellular assays would allow one to discover new biological activities associated with these molecules and also provide a more comprehensive profile of drug candidates early in the drug development process. Here we describe a robotic system, termed the automated compound profiler, capable of both propagating a large number of cell lines in parallel and assaying large collections of molecules simultaneously against a matrix of cellular assays in a highly reproducible manner. To illustrate its utility, we have characterized a set of 1,400 kinase inhibitors in a panel of 35 activated tyrosine-kinase-dependent cellular assays in dose–response format in a single experiment. Analysis of the resulting multidimensional dataset revealed subclusters of both inhibitors and kinases with closely correlated activities. The approach also identified activities for the p38 inhibitor BIRB796 and the dual src/abl inhibitor BMS-354825 and exposed the expected side activities for Glivec/STI571, including cellular inhibition of c-kit and platelet-derived growth factor receptor. This methodology provides a powerful tool for unraveling the cellular biology and molecular pharmacology of both naturally occurring and synthetic chemical diversity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0511292103

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 186

Metadata

Authors
Melnick, J. S., Janes, J., Kim, S., Chang, J. Y., Sipes, D. G., Gunderson, D., Jarnes, L., Matzen, J. T., Garcia, M. E., Hood, T. L., Beigi, R., Xia, G., Harig, R. A., Asatryan, H., Yan, S. F., Zhou, Y., Gu, X.-J., Saadat, A., Zhou, V., King, F. J., Shaw, C. M., Su, A. I., Downs, R., Gray, N. S., Schultz, P. G., Warmuth, M., & Caldwell, J. S.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2006-02-21
Volume
103
Issue
9
Pages
3153-3158
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1988750150
Cited by
186
References
1
FWCI
20.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An efficient rapid system for profiling the cellular activities of molecular libraries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0511292103
The paper
Melnick, J. S., Janes, J., Kim, S., Chang, J. Y., Sipes, D. G., Gunderson, D., Jarnes, L., Matzen, J. T., Garcia, M. E., Hood, T. L., Beigi, R., Xia, G., Harig, R. A., Asatryan, H., Yan, S. F., Zhou, Y., Gu, X.-J., Saadat, A., Zhou, V., . . . Caldwell, J. S. (2006). An efficient rapid system for profiling the cellular activities of molecular libraries. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0511292103

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.