The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Heritability of lobar brain volumes in twins supports genetic models of cerebral laterality and handedness
Open accessAbstract
Although the left and right human cerebral hemispheres differ both functionally and anatomically, little is known about the environmental or genetic factors that govern central nervous system asymmetry. Nevertheless, cerebral asymmetry is strongly correlated with handedness, and handedness does have a significant genetic component. To explore the relative contribution of environmental and genetic influences on cerebral asymmetry, we examined the volumes of left and right cerebral cortex in a large cohort of aging identical and fraternal twins and explored their relationship to handedness. Cerebral lobar volumes had a major genetic component, indicating that genes play a large role in changes in brain volume that occur with aging. Shared environment, which likely represents in utero events, had about twice the effect on the left hemisphere as on the right, consistent with less genetic control over the left hemisphere. To test the major genetic models of handedness and cerebral asymmetry, twin pairs were divided into those with two right handers and those with at least one left hander (nonright handers). Genetic factors contributed twice the influence to left and right cerebral hemispheric volumes in right-handed twin pairs, suggesting a large decrement in genetic control of cerebral volumes in the nonright-handed twin pairs. This loss of genetic determination of the left and right cerebral hemispheres in the nonright-handed twin pairs is consistent with models postulating a right-hand/left-hemisphere-biasing genetic influence, a “right-shift” genotype that is lost in nonright handers, resulting in decreased cerebral asymmetry.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory
Oldfield, R. C. (1971) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4 · Cited by 35,900
Cited by
Toga, A. W., & Thompson, P. M. (2003) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1009 · Cited by 1,495
Autism spectrum disorders: developmental disconnection syndromes
Geschwind, D. H., & Levitt, P. (2007) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2007.01.009 · Cited by 1,411
Self-citationWinkler, A. M., Kochunov, P., Blangero, J., Almasy, L., Zilles, K., Fox, P. T., Duggirala, R., & Glahn, D. C. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.028 · Cited by 1,172
Koolschijn, P. C. M. P., van Haren, N. E. M., Lensvelt‐Mulders, G. J. L. M., Hulshoff Pol, H. E., & Kahn, R. S. (2009) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20801 · Cited by 902
The origin of mind: Evolution of brain, cognition, and general intelligence.
Geary, D. C. (2005) · doi:10.1037/10871-000 · Cited by 551
Metadata
- Authors
- Geschwind, D. H., Miller, B. L., DeCarli, C., & Carmelli, D.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2002-02-26
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 3176-3181
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2119362641
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Heritability of lobar brain volumes in twins supports genetic models of cerebral laterality and handedness. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.052494999
- The paper
- Geschwind, D. H., Miller, B. L., DeCarli, C., & Carmelli, D. (2002). Heritability of lobar brain volumes in twins supports genetic models of cerebral laterality and handedness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.052494999
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.