Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 294

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Coil–globule transition in the denatured state of a small protein

Open access
Sherman, Eilon, Haran, Gilad·2006·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Upon transfer from strongly denaturing to native conditions, proteins undergo a collapse that either precedes folding or occurs simultaneously with it. This collapse is similar to the well known coil–globule transition of polymers. Here we employ single-molecule fluorescence methods to fully characterize the equilibrium coil–globule transition in the denatured state of the IgG-binding domain of protein L. By using FRET measurements on freely diffusing individual molecules, we determine the radius of gyration of the protein, which shows a gradual expansion as the concentration of the denaturant, guanidinium hydrochloride, is increased all the way up to 7 M. This expansion is observed also in fluorescence correlation spectroscopy measurements of the hydrodynamic radius of the protein. We analyze the radius of gyration measurements using the theory of the coil–globule transition of Sanchez [Sanchez, I. C. (1979) Macromolecules 12, 980–988], which balances the excluded volume entropy of the chain with the average interresidue interaction energy. In particular, we calculate the solvation energy of the denatured protein, a property that is not readily accessible in other experiments. The dependence of this energy on denaturant concentration is nonlinear, contrasting with the common linear extrapolation method used to describe denaturation energy. Interestingly, a fit to the binding model of chemical denaturation suggests a single denaturant binding site per protein residue. The size of the denatured protein under native conditions can be extrapolated from the data as well, showing that the fully collapsed state of protein is only ≈10% larger than the folded state.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0601395103

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 294

Metadata

Authors
Sherman, E., & Haran, G.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2006-08
Volume
103
Issue
31
Pages
11539-11543
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2124597092
Cited by
294
References
1
FWCI
7.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Coil–globule transition in the denatured state of a small protein. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0601395103
The paper
Sherman, E., & Haran, G. (2006). Coil–globule transition in the denatured state of a small protein. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0601395103

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.