The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The tomato FT ortholog triggers systemic signals that regulate growth and flowering and substitute for diverse environmental stimuli
Abstract
The systemic model for floral induction, dubbed florigen, was conceived in photoperiod-sensitive plants but implies, in its ultimate form, a graft-transmissible signal that, although activated by different stimuli in different flowering systems, is common to all plants. We show that SFT ( SINGLE-FLOWER TRUSS ), the tomato ortholog of FLOWERING LOCUS T ( FT ), induces flowering in day-neutral tomato and tobacco plants and is encoded by SFT . sft tomato mutant plants are late-flowering, with altered architecture and flower morphology. SFT -dependent graft-transmissible signals complement all developmental defects in sft plants and substitute for long-day stimuli in Arabidopsis , short-day stimuli in Maryland Mammoth tobacco, and light-dose requirements in tomato uniflora mutant plants. The absence of donor SFT RNA from flowering receptor shoots and the localization of the protein in leaf nuclei implicate florigen-like messages in tomato as a downstream pathway triggered by cell-autonomous SFT RNA transcripts. Flowering in tomato is synonymous with termination of the shoot apical meristems, and systemic SFT messages attenuate the growth of apical meristems before and independent of floral production. Floral enhancement by systemic SFT signals is therefore one pleiotropic effect of FT orthologs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Steeves, T. A., & Sussex, I. M. (1989) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511626227 · Cited by 1,334
Cited by
The genetic basis of flowering responses to seasonal cues
Andrés, F., & Coupland, G. (2012) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3291 · Cited by 1,538
Hd3a protein is a mobile flowering signal in rice
Tamaki, S., Matsuo, S., Wong, H. L., Yokoi, S., & Shimamoto, K. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1141753 · Cited by 1,248
The wheat and barley vernalization gene VRN3 is an orthologue of FT
Yan, L., Fu, D., Li, C., Blechl, A., Tranquilli, G., Bonafede, M., Sanchez, A., Valarik, M., Yasuda, S., & Dubcovsky, J. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0607142103 · Cited by 1,121
Genetic Regulation of Shoot Architecture
Wang, B., Smith, S. M., & Li, J. (2018) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-042817-040422 · Cited by 760
Flowering-time genes modulate meristem determinacy and growth form in Arabidopsis thaliana
Melzer, S., Lens, F., Gennen, J., Vanneste, S., Rohde, A., & Beeckman, T. (2008) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.253 · Cited by 448
Metadata
- Authors
- Lifschitz, E., Eviatar, T., Rozman, A., Shalit, A., Goldshmidt, A., Amsellem, Z., Alvarez, J. P., & Eshed, Y.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2006-04-18
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 6398-6403
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2097200095
- Cited by
- 630
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 35.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The tomato FT ortholog triggers systemic signals that regulate growth and flowering and substitute for diverse environmental stimuli. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0601620103
- The paper
- Lifschitz, E., Eviatar, T., Rozman, A., Shalit, A., Goldshmidt, A., Amsellem, Z., Alvarez, J. P., & Eshed, Y. (2006). The tomato FT ortholog triggers systemic signals that regulate growth and flowering and substitute for diverse environmental stimuli. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0601620103
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.