Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 279

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Bioportfolio: Lifelong persistence of variant and prototypic erythrovirus DNA genomes in human tissue

Norja, Päivi, Hokynar, Kati, Aaltonen, Leena-Maija, Chen, Renwei, Ranki, Annamari, Partio, Esa K., Kiviluoto, Olli, Davidkin, Irja, Leivo, Tomi, Eis-Hübinger, Anna Maria, Schneider, Beate, Fischer, Hans-Peter, Tolba, René, Vapalahti, Olli, Vaheri, Antti, Söderlund-Venermo, Maria, Hedman, Klaus·2006·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Human erythrovirus is a minute, single-stranded DNA virus causing many diseases, including erythema infectiosum, arthropathy, and fetal death. After primary infection, the viral genomes persist in solid tissues. Besides the prototype, virus type 1, two major variants (virus types 2 and 3) have been identified recently, the clinical significance and epidemiology of which are mostly unknown. We examined 523 samples of skin, synovium, tonsil, or liver (birth year range, 1913–2000), and 1,640 sera, by qualitative and quantitative molecular assays for the DNA of human erythroviruses. Virus types 1 and 2 were found in 132 (25%) and 58 (11%) tissues, respectively. DNA of virus type 1 was found in all age groups, whereas that of type 2 was strictly confined to those subjects born before 1973 ( P < 0.001). Correspondingly, the sera from the past two decades contained DNA of type 1 but not type 2 or 3. Our data suggest strongly that the newly identified human erythrovirus type 2 as well as the prototype 1 circulated in Northern and Central Europe in equal frequency, more than half a century ago, whereafter type 2 disappeared from circulation. Type 3 never attained wide occurrence in this area during the past ≥70 years. The erythrovirus DNA persistence in human tissues is lifelong and represents a source of information about our past, the Bioportfolio , which, at the individual level, provides a registry of one’s infectious encounters, and at the population level, a database for epidemiological and phylogenetic analyses.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0602259103

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 25 references

Cited by

See all 279

Metadata

Authors
Norja, P., Hokynar, K., Aaltonen, L.-M., Chen, R., Ranki, A., Partio, E. K., Kiviluoto, O., Davidkin, I., Leivo, T., Eis-Hübinger, A. M., Schneider, B., Fischer, H.-P., Tolba, R., Vapalahti, O., Vaheri, A., Söderlund-Venermo, M., & Hedman, K.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2006-05-09
Volume
103
Issue
19
Pages
7450-7453
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1979135557
Cited by
279
References
25
FWCI
12.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bioportfolio: Lifelong persistence of variant and prototypic erythrovirus DNA genomes in human tissue. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0602259103
The paper
Norja, P., Hokynar, K., Aaltonen, L.-M., Chen, R., Ranki, A., Partio, E. K., Kiviluoto, O., Davidkin, I., Leivo, T., Eis-Hübinger, A. M., Schneider, B., Fischer, H.-P., Tolba, R., Vapalahti, O., Vaheri, A., Söderlund-Venermo, M., & Hedman, K. (2006). Bioportfolio: Lifelong persistence of variant and prototypic erythrovirus DNA genomes in human tissue. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0602259103

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.