The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Fragments of ATP synthase mediate plant perception of insect attack
Abstract
Plants can perceive a wide range of biotic attackers and respond with targeted induced defenses. Specificity in plant non-self-recognition occurs either directly by perception of pest-derived elicitors or indirectly through resistance protein recognition of host targets that are inappropriately proteolyzed. Indirect plant perception can occur during interactions with pathogens, yet evidence for analogous events mediating the detection of insect herbivores remains elusive. Here we report indirect perception of herbivory in cowpea ( Vigna unguiculata ) plants attacked by fall armyworm ( Spodoptera frugiperda ) larvae. We isolated and identified a disulfide-bridged peptide ( + ICDINGVCVDA − ), termed inceptin, from S. frugiperda larval oral secretions that promotes cowpea ethylene production at 1 fmol leaf −1 and triggers increases in the defense-related phytohormones salicylic acid and jasmonic acid. Inceptins are proteolytic fragments of chloroplastic ATP synthase γ-subunit regulatory regions that mediate plant perception of herbivory through the induction of volatile, phenylpropanoid, and protease inhibitor defenses. Only S. frugiperda larvae that previously ingested chloroplastic ATP synthase γ-subunit proteins and produced inceptins significantly induced cowpea defenses after herbivory. Digestive fragments of an ancient and essential plant enzyme, inceptin functions as a potent indirect signal initiating specific plant responses to insect attack.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Behavioural and community ecology of plants that cry for help
DICKE, M. (2009) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2008.01913.x · Cited by 337
Damage-Associated Molecular Pattern-Triggered Immunity in Plants
Hou, S., Liu, Z., Shen, H., & Wu, D. (2019) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.00646 · Cited by 312
Plant–arthropod interactions: who is the winner?
Stahl, E., Hilfiker, O., & Reymond, P. (2018) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/tpj.13773 · Cited by 164
Gilardoni, P. A., Hettenhausen, C., Baldwin, I. T., & Bonaventure, G. (2011) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.111.088229 · Cited by 151
Benevenuto, R. F., Agapito-Tenfen, S. Z., Vilperte, V., Wikmark, O.-G., van Rensburg, P. J., & Nodari, R. O. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0173069 · Cited by 72
Metadata
- Authors
- Schmelz, E. A., Carroll, M. J., LeClere, S., Phipps, S. M., Meredith, J., Chourey, P. S., Alborn, H. T., & Teal, P. E. A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2006-06-06
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 8894-8899
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2090637307
- Cited by
- 416
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 24.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fragments of ATP synthase mediate plant perception of insect attack. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0602328103
- The paper
- Schmelz, E. A., Carroll, M. J., LeClere, S., Phipps, S. M., Meredith, J., Chourey, P. S., Alborn, H. T., & Teal, P. E. A. (2006). Fragments of ATP synthase mediate plant perception of insect attack. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0602328103
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.