Cited by 223

Differences in vertebrate microRNA expression

Ason, Brandon, Darnell, Diana K., Wittbrodt, Beate, Berezikov, Eugene, Kloosterman, Wigard P., Wittbrodt, Jochen, Antin, Parker B., Plasterk, Ronald H. A.·2006·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) attenuate gene expression by means of translational inhibition and mRNA degradation. They are abundant, highly conserved, and predicted to regulate a large number of transcripts. Several hundred miRNA classes are known, and many are associated with cell proliferation and differentiation. Many exhibit tissue-specific expression, which aids in evaluating their functions, and it has been assumed that their high level of sequence conservation implies a high level of expression conservation. A limited amount of data supports this, although discrepancies do exist. By comparing the expression of ≈100 miRNAs in medaka and chicken with existing data for zebrafish and mouse, we conclude that the timing and location of miRNA expression is not strictly conserved. In some instances, differences in expression are associated with changes in miRNA copy number, genomic context, or both between species. Variation in miRNA expression is more pronounced the greater the differences in physiology, and it is enticing to speculate that changes in miRNA expression may play a role in shaping the physiological differences produced during animal development.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0603529103

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a study of embryos from different species using miRNA in situ hybridization, miR-107 is essentially brain-specific in Japanese killifish, highly expressed in almost all tissues in chicken, but neither pattern is observed in mouse.

    “The complexity of this situation is illustrated in a study of embryos from different species using miRNA in situ hybridization, finding that miR-107 is essentially brain-specific in the Japanese killifish, highly expressed in almost all tissues in chicken, but neither pattern is observed in mouse [38].”
  • A cluster on chromosome 8 contains both miR-181a and miR-181b, but there is an additional copy of miR-181a on chromosome 22 and of miR-181b on chromosome 20.

    “A cluster on chromosome 8 contains both miR-181a and miR-181b but there is an additional copy of miR-181a on chromosome 22 and of miR-181b on chromosome 20 [19,44].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [22]Sapede D, Gompel N, Dambly-Chaudiere C, Ghysen A (2002) Development (Cambridge, UK) 129:605-615.
  2. [32]Westerfield M (1993) The Zebrafish Book (Univ Oregon Press, Eugene).
  3. [35]Berezikov E, van Tetering G, Verheul M, van de Belt J, van Laake L, Vos J, Verloop R, van de Wetering M, Guryev V, Takada S, et al . (2006) Genome Res , in press.
  4. [36]Darnell DK, Stanislaw SK, Konieczka JK, Yatskievych TA, Antin PB (2006) Dev Dyn , in press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ason, B., Darnell, D. K., Wittbrodt, B., Berezikov, E., Kloosterman, W. P., Wittbrodt, J., Antin, P. B., & Plasterk, R. H. A.
Affiliations
  • Hubrecht Laboratory, Uppsalalaan 8, 3584 CT, Utrecht, The Netherlands;
  • Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85724-5044; and
  • European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Meyerhofstrasse 1, D-69012 Heidelberg, Germany
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2006-09-26
Volume
103
Issue
39
Pages
14385-14389
ISSN
  • 0027-8424
  • 1091-6490
Cited by
223
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review