The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Plant domestication, a unique opportunity to identify the genetic basis of adaptation
Open accessAbstract
Despite the fundamental role of plant domestication in human history and the critical importance of a relatively small number of crop plants to modern societies, we still know little about adaptation under domestication. Here we focus on efforts to identify the genes responsible for adaptation to domestication. We start from a historical perspective, arguing that Darwin's conceptualization of domestication and unconscious selection provides valuable insight into the evolutionary history of crops and also provides a framework to evaluate modern methods used to decipher the genetic mechanisms underlying phenotypic change. We then review these methods, framing the discussion in terms of the phenotype–genotype hierarchy. Top-down approaches, such as quantitative trait locus and linkage disequilibrium mapping, start with a phenotype of interest and use genetic analysis to identify candidate genes. Bottom-up approaches, alternatively, use population genetic analyses to identify potentially adaptive genes and then rely on standard bioinformatics and reverse genetic tools to connect selected genes to a phenotype. We discuss the successes, advantages, and challenges of each, but we conclude that bottom-up approaches to understanding domestication as an adaptive process hold greater promise both for the study of adaptation and as a means to identify genes that contribute to agronomically important traits.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme
Gould, S. J., & Lewontin, R. C. (1979) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1979.0086 · Cited by 7,770
Thornton, K., & Andolfatto, P. (2006) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.105.048223 · Cited by 256
Cited by
Crop genomics: advances and applications
Morrell, P. L., Buckler, E. S., & Ross-Ibarra, J. (2012) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3097 · Cited by 507
Self-citationEckert, A. J., van Heerwaarden, J., Wegrzyn, J. L., Nelson, C. D., Ross-Ibarra, J., González-Martínez, S. C., & Neale, D. B. (2010) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.110.115543 · Cited by 396
Self-citationThe domestication and evolutionary ecology of apples
Cornille, A., Giraud, T., Smulders, M. J. M., Roldán-Ruiz, I., & Gladieux, P. (2014) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2013.10.002 · Cited by 366
Living to Die and Dying to Live: The Survival Strategy behind Leaf Senescence
Schippers, J. H. M., Schmidt, R., Wagstaff, C., & Jing, H.-C. (2015) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.15.00498 · Cited by 313
Yak whole-genome resequencing reveals domestication signatures and prehistoric population expansions
Qiu, Q., Wang, L., Wang, K., Yang, Y., Ma, T., Wang, Z., Zhang, X., Ni, Z., Hou, F., Long, R., et al. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms10283 · Cited by 304
Metadata
- Authors
- Ross-Ibarra, J., Morrell, P. L., & Gaut, B. S.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2007-05-15
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- suppl_1
- Pages
- 8641-8648
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2058702007
- Cited by
- 475
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Plant domestication, a unique opportunity to identify the genetic basis of adaptation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0700643104
- The paper
- Ross-Ibarra, J., Morrell, P. L., & Gaut, B. S. (2007). Plant domestication, a unique opportunity to identify the genetic basis of adaptation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0700643104
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.