Cited by 305Genomics and Chromatin DynamicsChromosomal and Genetic VariationsGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

Systematic discovery of regulatory motifs in conserved regions of the human genome, including thousands of CTCF insulator sites

Open access
Xie, Xiaohui, Mikkelsen, Tarjei S., Gnirke, Andreas, Lindblad-Toh, Kerstin, Kellis, Manolis, Lander, Eric S.·2007·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Conserved noncoding elements (CNEs) constitute the majority of sequences under purifying selection in the human genome, yet their function remains largely unknown. Experimental evidence suggests that many of these elements play regulatory roles, but little is known about regulatory motifs contained within them. Here we describe a systematic approach to discover and characterize regulatory motifs within mammalian CNEs by searching for long motifs (12–22 nt) with significant enrichment in CNEs and studying their biochemical and genomic properties. Our analysis identifies 233 long motifs (LMs), matching a total of ≈60,000 conserved instances across the human genome. These motifs include 16 previously known regulatory elements, such as the histone 3′-UTR motif and the neuron-restrictive silencer element, as well as striking examples of novel functional elements. The most highly enriched motif (LM1) corresponds to the X-box motif known from yeast and nematode. We show that it is bound by the RFX1 protein and identify thousands of conserved motif instances, suggesting a broad role for the RFX family in gene regulation. A second group of motifs (LM2*) does not match any previously known motif. We demonstrate by biochemical and computational methods that it defines a binding site for the CTCF protein, which is involved in insulator function to limit the spread of gene activation. We identify nearly 15,000 conserved sites that likely serve as insulators, and we show that nearby genes separated by predicted CTCF sites show markedly reduced correlation in gene expression. These sites may thus partition the human genome into domains of expression.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0701811104

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Divergent gene pairs separated by CTCF sites had lower than expected correlation of gene expression genome-wide, confirming the insulatory role of CTCF on the global scale.

    “and it was found that divergent gene pairs separated by CTCF sites had lower than expected correlation of gene expression genome-wide, confirming the insulatory role of CTCF on the global scale [327].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [18]Efimenko E, Bubb K, Mak HY, Holzman T, Leroux MR, Ruvkun G, Thomas JH, Swoboda P (2005) Development (Cambridge, UK) 132:1923-1934.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xie, X., Mikkelsen, T. S., Gnirke, A., Lindblad-Toh, K., Kellis, M., & Lander, E. S.
Affiliations
  • Broad Institute (US)
  • Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA 02142;
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2007-04-24
Volume
104
Issue
17
Pages
7145-7150
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2011457803
Cited by
305
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 28
FWCI
16.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Broad Institute
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (R01HG004037)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
conserved non-coding elements, regulatory motifs, RFX1, gene expression regulation, gene expression correlation, neuron-restrictive silencer element, human genome, chromatin domains
MeSH terms
Regulatory Factor X Transcription Factors, Regulatory Factor X1, CCCTC-Binding Factor, Base Sequence, Binding Sites, DNA-Binding Proteins, Humans, Molecular Sequence Data, Repressor Proteins, Species Specificity, Transcription Factors, Genome, Human, Conserved Sequence, Insulator Elements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review