Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 181

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hot spots in prion protein for pathogenic conversion

Open access
Kuwata, Kazuo, Nishida, Noriyuki, Matsumoto, Tomoharu, Kamatari, Yuji O., Hosokawa-Muto, Junji, Kodama, Kota, Nakamura, Hironori K., Kimura, Kiminori, Kawasaki, Makoto, Takakura, Yuka, Shirabe, Susumu, Takata, Jiro, Kataoka, Yasufumi, Katamine, Shigeru·2007·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Prion proteins are key molecules in transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs), but the precise mechanism of the conversion from the cellular form (PrP C ) to the scrapie form (PrP Sc ) is still unknown. Here we discovered a chemical chaperone to stabilize the PrP C conformation and identified the hot spots to stop the pathogenic conversion. We conducted in silico screening to find compounds that fitted into a “pocket” created by residues undergoing the conformational rearrangements between the native and the sparsely populated high-energy states (PrP*) and that directly bind to those residues. Forty-four selected compounds were tested in a TSE-infected cell culture model, among which one, 2-pyrrolidin-1-yl- N -[4-[4-(2-pyrrolidin-1-yl-acetylamino)-benzyl]-phenyl]-acetamide, termed GN8, efficiently reduced PrP Sc . Subsequently, administration of GN8 was found to prolong the survival of TSE-infected mice. Heteronuclear NMR and computer simulation showed that the specific binding sites are the A-S2 loop (N159) and the region from helix B (V189, T192, and K194) to B-C loop (E196), indicating that the intercalation of these distant regions (hot spots) hampers the pathogenic conversion process. Dynamics-based drug discovery strategy, demonstrated here focusing on the hot spots of PrP C , will open the way to the development of novel anti-prion drugs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0702671104

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Metadata

Authors
Kuwata, K., Nishida, N., Matsumoto, T., Kamatari, Y. O., Hosokawa-Muto, J., Kodama, K., Nakamura, H. K., Kimura, K., Kawasaki, M., Takakura, Y., Shirabe, S., Takata, J., Kataoka, Y., & Katamine, S.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2007-07-17
Volume
104
Issue
29
Pages
11921-11926
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2133721984
Cited by
181
References
1
FWCI
3.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hot spots in prion protein for pathogenic conversion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0702671104
The paper
Kuwata, K., Nishida, N., Matsumoto, T., Kamatari, Y. O., Hosokawa-Muto, J., Kodama, K., Nakamura, H. K., Kimura, K., Kawasaki, M., Takakura, Y., Shirabe, S., Takata, J., Kataoka, Y., & Katamine, S. (2007). Hot spots in prion protein for pathogenic conversion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0702671104

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.