Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,184

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Phenotypic characterization of human colorectal cancer stem cells

Open access
Dalerba, Piero, Dylla, Scott J., Park, In-Kyung, Liu, Rui, Wang, Xinhao, Cho, Robert W., Hoey, Timothy, Gurney, Austin, Huang, Emina H., Simeone, Diane M., Shelton, Andrew A., Parmiani, Giorgio, Castelli, Chiara, Clarke, Michael F.·2007·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Recent observations indicate that, in several types of human cancer, only a phenotypic subset of cancer cells within each tumor is capable of initiating tumor growth. This functional subset of cancer cells is operationally defined as the “cancer stem cell” (CSC) subset. Here we developed a CSC model for the study of human colorectal cancer (CRC). Solid CRC tissues, either primary tissues collected from surgical specimens or xenografts established in nonobese diabetic/severe combined immunodeficient (NOD/SCID) mice, were disaggregated into single-cell suspensions and analyzed by flow cytometry. Surface markers that displayed intratumor heterogeneous expression among epithelial cancer cells were selected for cell sorting and tumorigenicity experiments. Individual phenotypic cancer cell subsets were purified, and their tumor-initiating properties were investigated by injection in NOD/SCID mice. Our observations indicate that, in six of six human CRC tested, the ability to engraft in vivo in immunodeficient mice was restricted to a minority subpopulation of epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) high /CD44 + epithelial cells. Tumors originated from EpCAM high /CD44 + cells maintained a differentiated phenotype and reproduced the full morphologic and phenotypic heterogeneity of their parental lesions. Analysis of the surface molecule repertoire of EpCAM high /CD44 + cells led to the identification of CD166 as an additional differentially expressed marker, useful for CSC isolation in three of three CRC tested. These results validate the stem cell working model in human CRC and provide a highly robust surface marker profile for CRC stem cell isolation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0703478104

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 2,184

Metadata

Authors
Dalerba, P., Dylla, S. J., Park, I.-K., Liu, R., Wang, X., Cho, R. W., Hoey, T., Gurney, A., Huang, E. H., Simeone, D. M., Shelton, A. A., Parmiani, G., Castelli, C., & Clarke, M. F.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2007-06-12
Volume
104
Issue
24
Pages
10158-10163
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2081447858
Cited by
2,184
References
2
FWCI
60.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phenotypic characterization of human colorectal cancer stem cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0703478104
The paper
Dalerba, P., Dylla, S. J., Park, I.-K., Liu, R., Wang, X., Cho, R. W., Hoey, T., Gurney, A., Huang, E. H., Simeone, D. M., Shelton, A. A., Parmiani, G., Castelli, C., & Clarke, M. F. (2007). Phenotypic characterization of human colorectal cancer stem cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0703478104

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.