Cited by 734Child and Animal Learning DevelopmentSocial Robot Interaction and HRIAction Observation and Synchronization

The hidden structure of overimitation

Open access
Lyons, Derek E., Young, Andrew G., Keil, Frank C.·2007·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Young children are surprisingly judicious imitators, but there are also times when their reproduction of others' actions appears strikingly illogical. For example, children who observe an adult inefficiently operating a novel object frequently engage in what we term overimitation , persistently reproducing the adult's unnecessary actions. Although children readily overimitate irrelevant actions that even chimpanzees ignore, this curious effect has previously attracted little interest; it has been assumed that children overimitate not for theoretically significant reasons, but rather as a purely social exercise. In this paper, however, we challenge this view, presenting evidence that overimitation reflects a more fundamental cognitive process. We show that children who observe an adult intentionally manipulating a novel object have a strong tendency to encode all of the adult's actions as causally meaningful, implicitly revising their causal understanding of the object accordingly. This automatic causal encoding process allows children to rapidly calibrate their causal beliefs about even the most opaque physical systems, but it also carries a cost. When some of the adult's purposeful actions are unnecessary—even transparently so—children are highly prone to mis-encoding them as causally significant. The resulting distortions in children's causal beliefs are the true cause of overimitation, a fact that makes the effect remarkably resistant to extinction. Despite countervailing task demands, time pressure, and even direct warnings, children are frequently unable to avoid reproducing the adult's irrelevant actions because they have already incorporated them into their representation of the target object's causal structure.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0704452104

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Psychological factors implicated in cultural evolutionary processes include attentional resources, social learning biases and predispositions towards learning from other conspecifics that appear at least somewhat unique to humans.

    “Psychological factors (and the genetic predispositions that may underpin them) that are implicated in cultural evolutionary processes include the attentional resources, social learning biases and predispositions towards learning from other conspecifics that appear to be at least somewhat unique to humans”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 35 · Cited by 734

Authors
Lyons, D. E., Young, A. G., & Keil, F. C.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Lyons, Derek E.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2007-12-11
Volume
104
Issue
50
Pages
19751-19756
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2160172765
Cited by
734
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 66 · 2020: 91 · 2019: 62 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 44 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 40
FWCI
27.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Yale University
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R37HD023922)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
Keywords
overimitation, children's imitation, causal knowledge, causal beliefs, cognitive development, social learning
MeSH terms
Child, Preschool, Concept Formation, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review