The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Deep-water kelp refugia as potential hotspots of tropical marine diversity and productivity
Open accessAbstract
Classic marine ecological paradigms view kelp forests as inherently temperate-boreal phenomena replaced by coral reefs in tropical waters. These paradigms hinge on the notion that tropical surface waters are too warm and nutrient-depleted to support kelp productivity and survival. We present a synthetic oceanographic and ecophysiological model that accurately identifies all known kelp populations and, by using the same criteria, predicts the existence of >23,500 km 2 unexplored submerged (30- to 200-m depth) tropical kelp habitats. Predicted tropical kelp habitats were most probable in regions where bathymetry and upwelling resulted in mixed-layer shoaling above the depth of minimum annual irradiance dose for kelp survival. Using model predictions, we discovered extensive new deep-water Eisenia galapagensis populations in the Galápagos that increased in abundance with increasing depth to >60 m, complete with cold-water flora and fauna of temperate affinities. The predictability of deep-water kelp habitat and the discovery of expansive deep-water Galápagos kelp forests validate the extent of deep-water tropical kelp refugia, with potential implications for regional productivity and biodiversity, tropical food web ecology, and understanding of the resilience of tropical marine systems to climate change.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Marine biodiversity hotspots and conservation priorities for tropical reefs
Roberts, C. M., McClean, C. J., Veron, J. E. N., Hawkins, J. P., Allen, G. R., McAllister, D. E., Mittermeier, C. G., Schueler, F. W., Spalding, M., Wells, F., et al. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1067728 · Cited by 1,691
Cited by
Bio‐ORACLE: a global environmental dataset for marine species distribution modelling
Tyberghein, L., Verbruggen, H., Pauly, K., Troupin, C., Mineur, F., & De Clerck, O. (2012) · Global Ecology and Biogeography · doi:10.1111/j.1466-8238.2011.00656.x · Cited by 933
Bio‐ORACLE v2.0: Extending marine data layers for bioclimatic modelling
Assis, J., Tyberghein, L., Bosch, S., Verbruggen, H., Serrão, E. A., & De Clerck, O. (2018) · Global Ecology and Biogeography · doi:10.1111/geb.12693 · Cited by 931
EFFECTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON GLOBAL SEAWEED COMMUNITIES
Harley, C. D. G., Anderson, K. M., Demes, K. W., Jorve, J. P., Kordas, R. L., Coyle, T. A., & Graham, M. H. (2012) · Journal of Phycology · doi:10.1111/j.1529-8817.2012.01224.x · Cited by 707
Self-citationEcology of mesophotic coral reefs
Lesser, M. P., Slattery, M., & Leichter, J. J. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology · doi:10.1016/j.jembe.2009.05.009 · Cited by 526
Community ecology of mesophotic coral reef ecosystems
Kahng, S. E., Garcia-Sais, J. R., Spalding, H. L., Brokovich, E., Wagner, D., Weil, E., Hinderstein, L., & Toonen, R. J. (2010) · Coral Reefs · doi:10.1007/s00338-010-0593-6 · Cited by 481
Metadata
- Authors
- Graham, M. H., Kinlan, B. P., Druehl, L. D., Garske, L. E., & Banks, S.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2007-10-16
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 42
- Pages
- 16576-16580
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2061291156
- Cited by
- 203
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deep-water kelp refugia as potential hotspots of tropical marine diversity and productivity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0704778104
- The paper
- Graham, M. H., Kinlan, B. P., Druehl, L. D., Garske, L. E., & Banks, S. (2007). Deep-water kelp refugia as potential hotspots of tropical marine diversity and productivity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0704778104
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.