The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Unsupervised learning of vowel categories from infant-directed speech
Open accessAbstract
Infants rapidly learn the sound categories of their native language, even though they do not receive explicit or focused training. Recent research suggests that this learning is due to infants' sensitivity to the distribution of speech sounds and that infant-directed speech contains the distributional information needed to form native-language vowel categories. An algorithm, based on Expectation–Maximization, is presented here for learning the categories from a sequence of vowel tokens without ( i ) receiving any category information with each vowel token, ( ii ) knowing in advance the number of categories to learn, or ( iii ) having access to the entire data ensemble. When exposed to vowel tokens drawn from either English or Japanese infant-directed speech, the algorithm successfully discovered the language-specific vowel categories (/ i , i, ε, e/ for English, /i, iː, e, eː/ for Japanese). A nonparametric version of the algorithm, closely related to neural network models based on topographic representation and competitive Hebbian learning, also was able to discover the vowel categories, albeit somewhat less reliably. These results reinforce the proposal that native-language speech categories are acquired through distributional learning and that such learning may be instantiated in a biologically plausible manner.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2012) · Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_5195 · Cited by 19,370
Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis
Silverman, B. W. (2018) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781315140919 · Cited by 15,796
Chiang, L. H., Russell, E. L., & Braatz, R. D. (2001) · Advanced Textbooks in Control and Signal Processing · doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-0347-9_3 · Cited by 5,003
Werker, J. F., & Tees, R. C. (1984) · Infant Behavior and Development · doi:10.1016/s0163-6383(84)80022-3 · Cited by 2,801
Self-citationUnderstanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains.
Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.103.1.56 · Cited by 2,698
Self-citation(1998) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-5014-9 · Cited by 2,418
Simplified neuron model as a principal component analyzer
Oja, E. (1982) · Journal of Mathematical Biology · doi:10.1007/bf00275687 · Cited by 2,309
Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age
Kuhl, P. K., Williams, K. A., Lacerda, F., Stevens, K. N., & Lindblom, B. (1992) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1736364 · Cited by 2,086
Infant sensitivity to distributional information can affect phonetic discrimination
Maye, J., Werker, J. F., & Gerken, L. (2002) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(01)00157-3 · Cited by 1,364
Self-citationFeature Discovery by Competitive Learning*
Rumelhart, D. E., & Zipser, D. (1985) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0901_5 · Cited by 1,057
Cited by
Motherese in Interaction: At the Cross-Road of Emotion and Cognition? (A Systematic Review)
Saint-Georges, C., Chetouani, M., Cassel, R., Apicella, F., Mahdhaoui, A., Muratori, F., Laznik, M.-C., & Cohen, D. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078103 · Cited by 343
The Developmental Origins of Voice Processing in the Human Brain
Grossmann, T., Oberecker, R., Koch, S. P., & Friederici, A. D. (2010) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.03.001 · Cited by 310
Individual differences in online spoken word recognition: Implications for SLI
McMurray, B., Samelson, V. M., Lee, S. H., & Bruce Tomblin, J. (2010) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2009.06.003 · Cited by 277
The extraction and integration framework: A two-process account of statistical learning
Thiessen, E. D., Kronstein, A. T., & Hufnagle, D. G. (2013) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0030801 · Cited by 202
Neural signatures of phonetic learning in adulthood: a magnetoencephalography study
Zhang, Y., Kuhl, P. K., Imada, T., Iverson, P., Pruitt, J., Stevens, E. B., Kawakatsu, M., Tohkura, Y., & Nemoto, I. (2009) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.01.028 · Cited by 132
Metadata
- Authors
- Vallabha, G. K., McClelland, J. L., Pons, F., Werker, J. F., & Amano, S.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2007-08-14
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 33
- Pages
- 13273-13278
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2153767712
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 49
- FWCI
- 15.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Unsupervised learning of vowel categories from infant-directed speech. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0705369104
- The paper
- Vallabha, G. K., McClelland, J. L., Pons, F., Werker, J. F., & Amano, S. (2007). Unsupervised learning of vowel categories from infant-directed speech. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0705369104
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
