Social cheating in Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum sensing
Open accessAbstract
In a process termed quorum sensing, bacteria use diffusible chemical signals to coordinate cell density-dependent gene expression. In the human pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa , quorum sensing controls hundreds of genes, many of which encode extracellular virulence factors. Quorum sensing is required for P. aeruginosa virulence in animal models. Curiously, quorum sensing-deficient variants, most of which carry a mutation in the gene encoding the central quorum sensing regulator lasR , are frequently isolated from acute and chronic infections. The mechanism for their emergence is not known. Here we provide experimental evidence suggesting that these lasR mutants are social cheaters that cease production of quorum-controlled factors and take advantage of their production by the group. We detected an emerging subpopulation of lasR mutants after ≈100 generations of in vitro evolution of the P. aeruginosa wild-type strain under culture conditions that require quorum sensing for growth. Under such conditions, quorum sensing appears to impose a metabolic burden on the proliferating bacterial cell, because quorum-controlled genes not normally induced until cessation of growth were highly expressed early in growth, and a defined lasR mutant showed a growth advantage when cocultured with the parent strain. The emergence of quorum-sensing-deficient variants in certain environments is therefore an indicator of high quorum sensing activity of the bacterial population as a whole. It does not necessarily indicate that quorum sensing is insignificant, as has previously been suggested. Thus, novel antivirulence strategies aimed at disrupting bacterial communication may be particularly effective in such clinical settings.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In groups of microbes that produce a common good, free-riding cheats that do not produce the good usually grow fastest of all.
“However, within groups, free-riding cheats that do not produce the good usually grow fastest of all [199].”
From Fundamental constraints to the logic of living systems (2024) · cites this paper as [199]
Cites
Cooperation and competition in pathogenic bacteria
Griffin, A. S., West, S. A., & Buckling, A. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02744 · Cited by 1,104 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bjarnsholt, T., Jensen, P. Ø., Jakobsen, T. H., Phipps, R., Nielsen, A. K., Rybtke, M. T., Tolker-Nielsen, T., Givskov, M., Høiby, N., Ciofu, O., et al. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010115 · Cited by 261 · see citing works
Public goods and cheating in microbes
Smith, P., & Schuster, M. (2019) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2019.03.001 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
Self-citationLong-term social dynamics drive loss of function in pathogenic bacteria
Andersen, S. B., Marvig, R. L., Molin, S., Krogh Johansen, H., & Griffin, A. S. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1508324112 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Control of bacterial metabolism by quorum sensing
Goo, E., An, J. H., Kang, Y., & Hwang, I. (2015) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2015.05.007 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Kin selection for cooperation in natural bacterial populations
Belcher, L. J., Dewar, A. E., Ghoul, M., & West, S. A. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2119070119 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Fundamental constraints to the logic of living systems
Solé, R., Kempes, C. P., Corominas-Murtra, B., De Domenico, M., Kolchinsky, A., Lachmann, M., Libby, E., Saavedra, S., Smith, E., & Wolpert, D. (2024) · Interface Focus · doi:10.1098/rsfs.2024.0010 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
“However, within groups, free-riding cheats that do not produce the good usually grow fastest of all [199].”
Background
- Authors
- Sandoz, K. M., Mitzimberg, S. M., & Schuster, M.
- Affiliations
- Oregon State University (US)
- Microbiology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331
- ORCID
- Sandoz, Kelsi M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2007-10-02
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 40
- Pages
- 15876-15881
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC2000394
- OpenAlex
- W1980352067
- Cited by
- 480
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 21
- FWCI
- 9.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Washington
- Oregon State University
- Université de Lausanne
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies
- Keywords
- quorum sensing, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, LasR, social cheating, in vitro evolution, virulence factors, bacterial communication, anti-virulence strategies, metabolic burden, bacterial virulence
- MeSH terms
- Cell Communication, Cell Division, Humans, Kinetics, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Genetic Variation, Virulence, Quorum Sensing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review