Cited by 98Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsOptical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques

Evidence for a vascular contribution to diffusion FMRI at high b value

Open access
Miller, Karla L., Bulte, Daniel P., Devlin, Hannah, Robson, Matthew D., Wise, Richard G., Woolrich, Mark W., Jezzard, Peter, Behrens, Timothy E. J.·2007·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Recent work has suggested that diffusion-weighted functional magnetic resonance imaging (FMRI) with strong diffusion weighting (high b value) detects neuronal swelling that is directly related to neuronal firing. This would constitute a much more direct measure of brain activity than current methods and represent a major advance in neuroimaging. However, it has not been firmly established that the observed signal changes do not reflect residual vascular effects, which are known to exist at low b value. This study measures the vascular component of diffusion FMRI directly by using hypercapnia, which induces blood flow changes in the absence of a change in neuronal firing. Hypercapnia elicits a similar diffusion FMRI response to a visual stimulus including a rise in percent signal change with increasing b value, which was reported for visual activation. Analysis of the response timing found no evidence for an early response at high b value, which has been reported as evidence for a nonhemodynamic response. These results suggest that a large component of the diffusion FMRI signal at high b value is vascular rather than neuronal.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0707257105

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • DfMRI remained controversial because in vivo diffusion-weighted signals can still contain vascular contributions.

    “At the same time, DfMRI remained controversial because in vivo diffusion-weighted signals can still contain vascular contributions (Miller et al., 2007).”

    From 40 Years of diffusion MRI in the brain: From history to emerging frontiers (2026) · cites this paper as Miller et al., 2007

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miller, K. L., Bulte, D. P., Devlin, H., Robson, M. D., Wise, R. G., Woolrich, M. W., Jezzard, P., & Behrens, T. E. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging (GB)
  • Cardiff University (GB)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2007-12-26
Volume
104
Issue
52
Pages
20967-20972
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2112307156
Cited by
98
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
FWCI
3.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
Keywords
high b-value, neuronal swelling, hypercapnia, cerebral blood flow, visual stimulation, brain activity measurement
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Brain, Brain Mapping, Cerebrovascular Circulation, Diffusion, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Models, Neurological, Neurons, Time Factors, Models, Statistical, Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review