Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 198

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

α-Helices direct excitation energy flow in the Fenna–Matthews–Olson protein

Open access
Müh, Frank, Madjet, Mohamed El-Amine, Adolphs, Julia, Abdurahman, Ayjamal, Rabenstein, Björn, Ishikita, Hiroshi, Knapp, Ernst-Walter, Renger, Thomas·2007·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

In photosynthesis, light is captured by antenna proteins. These proteins transfer the excitation energy with almost 100% quantum efficiency to the reaction centers, where charge separation takes place. The time scale and pathways of this transfer are controlled by the protein scaffold, which holds the pigments at optimal geometry and tunes their excitation energies (site energies). The detailed understanding of the tuning of site energies by the protein has been an unsolved problem since the first high-resolution crystal structure of a light-harvesting antenna appeared >30 years ago [Fenna RE, Matthews BW (1975) Nature 258:573–577]. Here, we present a combined quantum chemical/electrostatic approach to compute site energies that considers the whole protein in atomic detail and provides the missing link between crystallography and spectroscopy. The calculation of site energies of the Fenna–Matthews–Olson protein results in optical spectra that are in quantitative agreement with experiment and reveals an unexpectedly strong influence of the backbone of two α-helices. The electric field from the latter defines the direction of excitation energy flow in the Fenna–Matthews–Olson protein, whereas the effects of amino acid side chains, hitherto thought to be crucial, largely compensate each other. This result challenges the current view of how energy flow is regulated in pigment–protein complexes and demonstrates that attention has to be paid to the backbone architecture.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0708222104

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 198

Metadata

Authors
Müh, F., Madjet, M. E.-A., Adolphs, J., Abdurahman, A., Rabenstein, B., Ishikita, H., Knapp, E.-W., & Renger, T.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2007-10-23
Volume
104
Issue
43
Pages
16862-16867
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2060234842
Cited by
198
References
3
FWCI
9.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: α-Helices direct excitation energy flow in the Fenna–Matthews–Olson protein. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0708222104
The paper
Müh, F., Madjet, M. E.-A., Adolphs, J., Abdurahman, A., Rabenstein, B., Ishikita, H., Knapp, E.-W., & Renger, T. (2007). α-Helices direct excitation energy flow in the Fenna–Matthews–Olson protein. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0708222104

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.