Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 255

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Optimal induction of T helper 17 cells in humans requires T cell receptor ligation in the context of Toll-like receptor-activated monocytes

Open access
Evans, Hayley G., Suddason, Tesha, Jackson, Ian, Taams, Leonie S., Lord, Graham M.·2007·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Recently, a new lineage of CD4 + T cells has been described in the mouse that specifically secretes IL-17 [T helper (Th) 17]. This discovery has led to a revision of the hypothesis that many autoimmune diseases are predominantly a Th1 phenomenon and may instead be critically dependent on the presence of Th17 cells. Murine Th17 cells differentiate from naïve T cell precursors in the presence of TGF-β and IL-6 or IL-21. However, given their putative importance in human autoimmunity, very little is known about the pathways that control the expression of IL-17 in humans. Here we show that the factors that determine the expression of IL-17 in human CD4 + T cells are completely different from mice. IL-6 and IL-21 were unable to induce IL-17 expression in either naïve or effector T cells, and TGF-β actually inhibited IL-17 expression. The expression of IL-17 was maximally induced from precommitted precursors present in human peripheral blood by cell–cell contact with Toll-like receptor-activated monocytes in the context of T cell receptor ligation. Furthermore, unlike IFN-γ, IL-17 expression was not suppressed by the presence of FOXP3 + regulatory CD4 + T cells. Taken together, these data indicate that human and mouse Th17 cells have important biological differences that may be of critical importance in the development of therapeutic interventions in diseases characterized by aberrant T cell polarization.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0708426104

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Cited by

See all 255

Metadata

Authors
Evans, H. G., Suddason, T., Jackson, I., Taams, L. S., & Lord, G. M.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2007-10-23
Volume
104
Issue
43
Pages
17034-17039
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1982243301
Cited by
255
References
14
FWCI
13.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optimal induction of T helper 17 cells in humans requires T cell receptor ligation in the context of Toll-like receptor-activated monocytes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0708426104
The paper
Evans, H. G., Suddason, T., Jackson, I., Taams, L. S., & Lord, G. M. (2007). Optimal induction of T helper 17 cells in humans requires T cell receptor ligation in the context of Toll-like receptor-activated monocytes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0708426104

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.