The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Temporal and spatial changes in social vulnerability to natural hazards
Open accessAbstract
During the past four decades (1960–2000), the United States experienced major transformations in population size, development patterns, economic conditions, and social characteristics. These social, economic, and built-environment changes altered the American hazardscape in profound ways, with more people living in high-hazard areas than ever before. To improve emergency management, it is important to recognize the variability in the vulnerable populations exposed to hazards and to develop place-based emergency plans accordingly. The concept of social vulnerability identifies sensitive populations that may be less likely to respond to, cope with, and recover from a natural disaster. Social vulnerability is complex and dynamic, changing over space and through time. This paper presents empirical evidence on the spatial and temporal patterns in social vulnerability in the United States from 1960 to the present. Using counties as our study unit, we found that those components that consistently increased social vulnerability for all time periods were density (urban), race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. The spatial patterning of social vulnerability, although initially concentrated in certain geographic regions, has become more dispersed over time. The national trend shows a steady reduction in social vulnerability, but there is considerable regional variability, with many counties increasing in social vulnerability during the past five decades.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adger, W. N. (2006) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.006 · Cited by 5,417
Brooks, N., Neil Adger, W., & Mick Kelly, P. (2005) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.12.006 · Cited by 2,049
Cited by
A Social Vulnerability Index for Disaster Management
Flanagan, B. E., Gregory, E. W., Hallisey, E. J., Heitgerd, J. L., & Lewis, B. (2011) · Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management · doi:10.2202/1547-7355.1792 · Cited by 1,860
The psychological impacts of global climate change
Doherty, T. J., & Clayton, S. (2011) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0023141 · Cited by 894
Spatial planning for multifunctional green infrastructure: Growing resilience in Detroit
Meerow, S., & Newell, J. P. (2017) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.10.005 · Cited by 892
Determinants of Risk: Exposure and Vulnerability
Cardona, O.-D., van Aalst, M. K., Birkmann, J., Fordham, M., McGregor, G., Perez, R., Pulwarty, R. S., Schipper, E. L. F., Sinh, B. T., Décamps, H., et al. (2012) · Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139177245.005 · Cited by 1,007
Combining hazard, exposure and social vulnerability to provide lessons for flood risk management
Koks, E. E., Jongman, B., Husby, T. G., & Botzen, W. J. W. (2015) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2014.10.013 · Cited by 677
Metadata
- Authors
- Cutter, S. L., & Finch, C.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2008-02-19
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2301-2306
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2069163966
- Cited by
- 1,326
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 78.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Temporal and spatial changes in social vulnerability to natural hazards. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0710375105
- The paper
- Cutter, S. L., & Finch, C. (2008). Temporal and spatial changes in social vulnerability to natural hazards. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0710375105
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.