The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Coexisting generalist herbivores occupy unique nutritional feeding niches
Open accessAbstract
A mainstay of ecological theory and practice is that coexisting species use different resources, leading to the local development of biodiversity. However, a problem arises for understanding coexistence of multiple species if they share critical resources too generally. Here, we employ an experimental framework grounded in nutritional physiology to show that closely related, cooccurring and generalist-feeding herbivores (seven grasshopper species in the genus Melanoplus ; Orthoptera: Acrididae) eat protein and carbohydrate in different absolute amounts and ratios even if they eat the same plant taxa. The existence of species-specific nutritional niches provides a cryptic mechanism that helps explain how generalist herbivores with broadly overlapping diets might coexist. We also show that performance by grasshoppers allowed to mix their diets and thus regulate their protein–carbohydrate intake matched optimal performance peaks generated from no-choice treatments. These results indicate the active nature of diet selection to achieve balanced diets and provide buffering capacity in the face of variable food quality. Our empirical findings and experimental approach can be extended to generate and test predictions concerning the intensity of biotic interactions between species, the relative abundance of species, yearly fluctuations in population size, and the nature of interactions with natural enemies in tritrophic niche space.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mechanisms of Maintenance of Species Diversity
Chesson, P. (2000) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.343 · Cited by 6,645
Cited by
Understanding insect life histories and senescence through a resource allocation lens
Boggs, C. L. (2009) · Functional Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2435.2009.01527.x · Cited by 448
Vaudo, A. D., Tooker, J. F., Patch, H. M., Biddinger, D. J., Coccia, M., Crone, M. K., Fiely, M., Francis, J. S., Hines, H. M., Hodges, M., et al. (2020) · Insects · doi:10.3390/insects11020132 · Cited by 266
Deraison, H., Badenhausser, I., Loeuille, N., Scherber, C., & Gross, N. (2015) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/ele.12529 · Cited by 69
Warbrick‐Smith, J., Raubenheimer, D., Simpson, S. J., & Behmer, S. T. (2009) · Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata · doi:10.1111/j.1570-7458.2009.00870.x · Cited by 45
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Behmer, S. T., & Joern, A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2008-02-12
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1977-1982
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2106279720
- Cited by
- 260
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 19.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Coexisting generalist herbivores occupy unique nutritional feeding niches. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0711870105
- The paper
- Behmer, S. T., & Joern, A. (2008). Coexisting generalist herbivores occupy unique nutritional feeding niches. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0711870105
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.