The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Proteomic analysis of lithium-induced nephrogenic diabetes insipidus: Mechanisms for aquaporin 2 down-regulation and cellular proliferation
Abstract
Lithium is a commonly prescribed mood-stabilizing drug. However, chronic treatment with lithium induces numerous kidney-related side effects, such as dramatically reduced aquaporin 2 (AQP2) abundance, altered renal function, and structural changes. As a model system, inner medullary collecting ducts (IMCD) isolated from rats treated with lithium for either 1 or 2 weeks were subjected to differential 2D gel electrophoresis combined with mass spectrometry and bioinformatics analysis to identify ( i ) signaling pathways affected by lithium and ( ii ) unique candidate proteins for AQP2 regulation. After 1 or 2 weeks of lithium treatment, we identified 6 and 74 proteins with altered abundance compared with controls, respectively. We randomly selected 17 proteins with altered abundance caused by lithium treatment for validation by immunoblotting. Bioinformatics analysis of the data indicated that proteins involved in cell death, apoptosis, cell proliferation, and morphology are highly affected by lithium. We demonstrate that members of several signaling pathways are activated by lithium treatment, including the PKB/Akt-kinase and the mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK), such as extracellular regulated kinase (ERK), c-Jun NH 2 -terminal kinase (JNK), and p38. Lithium treatment increased the intracellular accumulation of β-catenin in association with increased levels of phosphorylated glycogen synthase kinase type 3β (GSK3β). This study provides a comprehensive analysis of the proteins affected by lithium treatment in the IMCD and, as such, provides clues to potential lithium targets in the brain.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“The relationship between SNCA clearnace and autophagy has also been exploited in yeast studies during chronological aging with SNCA expressed under the control of a constitutive promotor [349,351,368,626].”
From Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition) 1 (2021) · cites this paper as [626]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 26
- 10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.11.003 · DOI
- 10.2165/00003495-199346010-00002 · DOI
- 10.1681/ASN.V103666 · DOI
- 10.1152/ajprenal.2000.279.3.F552 · DOI
- 10.1172/JCI117863 · DOI
- 10.1152/ajprenal.00118.2003 · DOI
- K Thomsen, M Bak, DG Shirley, Chronic lithium treatment inhibits amiloride-sensitive sodium transport in the rat distal nephron. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 289, 443–447 (1999). · DOI
- 10.1152/ajprenal.00176.2003 · DOI
- 10.1152/ajpcell.00266.2003 · DOI
- 10.1152/ajprenal.00383.2005 · DOI
- 10.1681/ASN.V1181439 · DOI
- 10.4161/cc.5.22.3448 · DOI
- 10.1159/000101306 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2007.06.009 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1152/physrev.00024.2001 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0960-9822(02)70790-2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.93.16.8455 · DOI
- 10.1152/ajprenal.00287.2004 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.275.11.7583 · DOI
- 10.1152/ajprenal.2000.278.3.F388 · DOI
- 10.1038/35017574 · DOI
- 10.1007/s000180050449 · DOI
- 10.1681/ASN.2005080884 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bbamem.2006.06.001 · DOI
- CL Chou, SR DiGiovanni, A Luther, SJ Lolait, MA Knepper, Oxytocin as an antidiuretic hormone II: Role of V2 vasopressin receptor. Am J Physiol 269, F78–F85 (1995).
- 10.1152/ajprenal.00223.2003 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition).
Klionsky, D. J., Abdelmohsen, K., Abe, A., Abedin, M. J., Abeliovich, H., Acevedo Arozena, A., Adachi, H., Adams, C. M., Adams, P. D., Adeli, K., et al. (2016) · Autophagy · doi:10.1080/15548627.2015.1100356 · Cited by 5,894
Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition) 1
Klionsky, D. J., Abdel-Aziz, A. K., Abdelfatah, S., Abdellatif, M., Abdoli, A., Abel, S., Abeliovich, H., Abildgaard, M. H., Abudu, Y. P., Acevedo-Arozena, A., et al. (2021) · Autophagy · doi:10.1080/15548627.2020.1797280 · Cited by 2,897
Proteomic analysis of rat hippocampus exposed to the antidepressant paroxetine
McHugh, P., Rogers, G., Glubb, D., Joyce, P., & Kennedy, M. (2010) · Journal of Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1177/0269881109102786 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Nielsen, J., Hoffert, J. D., Knepper, M. A., Agre, P., Nielsen, S., & Fenton, R. A.
- Affiliations
- *Water and Salt Research Center, University of Aarhus, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark;
- Laboratory of Kidney and Electrolyte Metabolism, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892; and
- Department of Cell Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2008-03-04
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 3634-3639
- ISSN
- 0027-8424
- 1091-6490
- Cited by
- 109
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review