The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Drug interactions modulate the potential for evolution of resistance
Open accessAbstract
Antimicrobial treatments increasingly rely on multidrug combinations, in part because of the emergence and spread of antibiotic resistance. The continued effectiveness of combination treatments depends crucially on the frequency with which multidrug resistance arises. Yet, it is unknown how this propensity for resistance depends on cross-resistance and on epistatic interactions—ranging from synergy to antagonism—between the drugs. Here, we analyzed how interactions between pairs of drugs affect the spontaneous emergence of resistance in the medically important pathogen Staphylococcus aureus . Resistance is selected for within a window of drug concentrations high enough to inhibit wild-type growth but low enough for some resistant mutants to grow. Introducing an experimental method for high-throughput colony imaging, we counted resistant colonies arising across a two-dimensional matrix of drug concentrations for each of three drug pairs. Our data show that these different drug combinations have significantly different impacts on the size of the window of drug concentrations where resistance is selected for. We framed these results in a mathematical model in which the frequencies of resistance to single drugs, cross-resistance, and epistasis combine to determine the propensity for multidrug resistance. The theory suggests that drug pairs which interact synergistically, preferred for their immediate efficacy, may in fact favor the future evolution of resistance. This framework reveals the central role of drug epistasis in the evolution of resistance and points to new strategies for combating the emergence of drug-resistant bacteria.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bacterial Persistence as a Phenotypic Switch
Balaban, N. Q., Merrin, J., Chait, R., Kowalik, L., & Leibler, S. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1099390 · Cited by 2,952
Self-citationMethicillin-Resistant S. aureus Infections among Patients in the Emergency Department
Moran, G. J., Krishnadasan, A., Gorwitz, R. J., Fosheim, G. E., McDougal, L. K., Carey, R. B., & Talan, D. A. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa055356 · Cited by 2,285
Pharmacodynamics: Relation to Antimicrobial Resistance
Rybak, M. J. (2006) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2006.04.001 · Cited by 120
Cited by
Domingo, E., Sheldon, J., & Perales, C. (2012) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.05023-11 · Cited by 1,009
Evolutionary paths to antibiotic resistance under dynamically sustained drug selection
Toprak, E., Veres, A., Michel, J.-B., Chait, R., Hartl, D. L., & Kishony, R. (2012) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.1034 · Cited by 764
Self-citationMultidrug evolutionary strategies to reverse antibiotic resistance
Baym, M., Stone, L. K., & Kishony, R. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aad3292 · Cited by 710
Self-citationSelective pressure of antibiotic pollution on bacteria of importance to public health
Tello, A., Austin, B., & Telfer, T. C. (2012) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.1104650 · Cited by 383
Drug interactions and the evolution of antibiotic resistance
Yeh, P. J., Hegreness, M. J., Aiden, A. P., & Kishony, R. (2009) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2133 · Cited by 350
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Michel, J.-B., Yeh, P. J., Chait, R., Moellering, R. C., & Kishony, R.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2008-09-30
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 39
- Pages
- 14918-14923
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2034243251
- Cited by
- 215
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 3.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Drug interactions modulate the potential for evolution of resistance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0800944105
- The paper
- Michel, J.-B., Yeh, P. J., Chait, R., Moellering, R. C., & Kishony, R. (2008). Drug interactions modulate the potential for evolution of resistance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0800944105
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.