The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CUR matrix decompositions for improved data analysis
Open accessAbstract
Principal components analysis and, more generally, the Singular Value Decomposition are fundamental data analysis tools that express a data matrix in terms of a sequence of orthogonal or uncorrelated vectors of decreasing importance. Unfortunately, being linear combinations of up to all the data points, these vectors are notoriously difficult to interpret in terms of the data and processes generating the data. In this article, we develop CUR matrix decompositions for improved data analysis. CUR decompositions are low-rank matrix decompositions that are explicitly expressed in terms of a small number of actual columns and/or actual rows of the data matrix. Because they are constructed from actual data elements, CUR decompositions are interpretable by practitioners of the field from which the data are drawn (to the extent that the original data are). We present an algorithm that preferentially chooses columns and rows that exhibit high “statistical leverage” and, thus, in a very precise statistical sense, exert a disproportionately large “influence” on the best low-rank fit of the data matrix. By selecting columns and rows in this manner, we obtain improved relative-error and constant-factor approximation guarantees in worst-case analysis, as opposed to the much coarser additive-error guarantees of prior work. In addition, since the construction involves computing quantities with a natural and widely studied statistical interpretation, we can leverage ideas from diagnostic regression analysis to employ these matrix decompositions for exploratory data analysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1979) · Cited by 43,841
Golub, G. (2012) · doi:10.56021/9781421407944 · Cited by 34,505
Indexing by latent semantic analysis
Deerwester, S., Dumais, S. T., Furnas, G. W., Landauer, T. K., & Harshman, R. (1990) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(199009)41:6<391::aid-asi1>3.0.co;2-9 · Cited by 12,751
Proceedings of the 24th international conference on Machine learning
(2007) · doi:10.1145/1273496 · Cited by 11,630
(1996) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.34-2458 · Cited by 3,732
Regression Analysis by Example.
Kmenta, J., Chatterjee, S., & Price, B. (1980) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2287213 · Cited by 3,198
(1991) · Mathematics and Computers in Simulation · doi:10.1016/0378-4754(91)90038-5 · Cited by 2,437
A Genome-Wide Transcriptional Analysis of the Mitotic Cell Cycle
Cho, R. J., Campbell, M. J., Winzeler, E. A., Steinmetz, L., Conway, A., Wodicka, L., Wolfsberg, T. G., Gabrielian, A. E., Landsman, D., Lockhart, D. J., et al. (1998) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80114-8 · Cited by 2,046
Singular value decomposition for genome-wide expression data processing and modeling
Alter, O., Brown, P. O., & Botstein, D. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.97.18.10101 · Cited by 1,971
Bogaevski, V. N., & Povzner, A. (1991) · Applied Mathematical Sciences · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4438-7_1 · Cited by 1,384
Cited by
Challenges of Big Data analysis
Fan, J., Han, F., & Liu, H. (2014) · National Science Review · doi:10.1093/nsr/nwt032 · Cited by 1,482
Combining Machine Learning and Computational Chemistry for Predictive Insights Into Chemical Systems
Keith, J. A., Vassilev-Galindo, V., Cheng, B., Chmiela, S., Gastegger, M., Müller, K.-R., & Tkatchenko, A. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00107 · Cited by 849
Jinnouchi, R., Lahnsteiner, J., Karsai, F., Kresse, G., & Bokdam, M. (2019) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.225701 · Cited by 635
Physics-Inspired Structural Representations for Molecules and Materials
Musil, F., Grisafi, A., Bartók, A. P., Ortner, C., Csányi, G., & Ceriotti, M. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00021 · Cited by 523
Imbalzano, G., Anelli, A., Giofré, D., Klees, S., Behler, J., & Ceriotti, M. (2018) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.5024611 · Cited by 330
Metadata
- Authors
- Mahoney, M. W., & Drineas, P.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2009-01-20
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 697-702
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2141696759
- Cited by
- 773
- References
- 32
- FWCI
- 24.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CUR matrix decompositions for improved data analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0803205106
- The paper
- Mahoney, M. W., & Drineas, P. (2009). CUR matrix decompositions for improved data analysis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0803205106
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.