The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Kinetics of amorphous silica dissolution and the paradox of the silica polymorphs
Open accessAbstract
The mechanisms by which amorphous silica dissolves have proven elusive because noncrystalline materials lack the structural order that allows them to be studied by the classical terrace, ledge, kink-based models applied to crystals. This would seem to imply amorphous phases have surfaces that are disordered at an atomic scale so that the transfer of SiO 4 tetrahedra to solution always leaves the surface free energy of the solid unchanged. As a consequence, dissolution rates of amorphous phases should simply scale linearly with increasing driving force (undersaturation) through the higher probability of detaching silica tetrahedra. By examining rate measurements for two amorphous SiO 2 glasses we find, instead, a paradox. In electrolyte solutions, these silicas show the same exponential dependence on driving force as their crystalline counterpart, quartz. We analyze this enigma by considering that amorphous silicas present two predominant types of surface-coordinated silica tetrahedra to solution. Electrolytes overcome the energy barrier to nucleated detachment of higher coordinated species to create a periphery of reactive, lesser coordinated groups that increase surface energy. The result is a plausible mechanism-based model that is formally identical with the classical polynuclear theory developed for crystal growth. The model also accounts for reported demineralization rates of natural biogenic and synthetic colloidal silicas. In principle, these insights should be applicable to materials with a wide variety of compositions and structural order when the reacting units are defined by the energies of their constituent species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mechanisms of classical crystal growth theory explain quartz and silicate dissolution behavior
Dove, P. M., Han, N., & De Yoreo, J. J. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0507777102 · Cited by 321
Self-citationFeldspar dissolution at 25°C and pH 3: Reaction stoichiometry and the effect of cations
Stillings, L. L., & Brantley, S. L. (1995) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/0016-7037(95)00057-7 · Cited by 289
Cited by
Reactivity of supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) in cement blends
Skibsted, J., & Snellings, R. (2019) · Cement and Concrete Research · doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2019.105799 · Cited by 984
Croissant, J. G., Fatieiev, Y., & Khashab, N. M. (2017) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201604634 · Cited by 782
A contemporary overview of silicon availability in agricultural soils
Haynes, R. J. (2014) · Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science · doi:10.1002/jpln.201400202 · Cited by 353
Cornelis, J.-T., Delvaux, B., Georg, R. B., Lucas, Y., Ranger, J., & Opfergelt, S. (2011) · Biogeosciences · doi:10.5194/bg-8-89-2011 · Cited by 299
Ehrlich, H., Demadis, K. D., Pokrovsky, O. S., & Koutsoukos, P. G. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr900334y · Cited by 275
Metadata
- Authors
- Dove, P. M., Han, N., Wallace, A. F., & De Yoreo, J. J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2008-07-22
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 29
- Pages
- 9903-9908
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2006413842
- Cited by
- 252
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 2.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Kinetics of amorphous silica dissolution and the paradox of the silica polymorphs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0803798105
- The paper
- Dove, P. M., Han, N., Wallace, A. F., & De Yoreo, J. J. (2008). Kinetics of amorphous silica dissolution and the paradox of the silica polymorphs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0803798105
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.