The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conformational flexibility facilitates self-assembly of complex DNA nanostructures
Open accessAbstract
Molecular self-assembly is a promising approach to the preparation of nanostructures. DNA, in particular, shows great potential to be a superb molecular system. Synthetic DNA molecules have been programmed to assemble into a wide range of nanostructures. It is generally believed that rigidities of DNA nanomotifs (tiles) are essential for programmable self-assembly of well defined nanostructures. Recently, we have shown that adequate conformational flexibility could be exploited for assembling 3D objects, including tetrahedra, dodecahedra, and buckyballs, out of DNA three-point star motifs. In the current study, we have integrated tensegrity principle into this concept to assemble well defined, complex nanostructures in both 2D and 3D. A symmetric five-point-star motif (tile) has been designed to assemble into icosahedra or large nanocages depending on the concentration and flexibility of the DNA tiles. In both cases, the DNA tiles exhibit significant flexibilities and undergo substantial conformational changes, either symmetrically bending out of the plane or asymmetrically bending in the plane. In contrast to the complicated natures of the assembled structures, the approach presented here is simple and only requires three different component DNA strands. These results demonstrate that conformational flexibility could be explored to generate complex DNA nanostructures. The basic concept might be further extended to other biomacromolecular systems, such as RNA and proteins.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Design and self-assembly of two-dimensional DNA crystals
Winfree, E., Liu, F., Wenzler, L. A., & Seeman, N. C. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/28998 · Cited by 2,857
A 1.7-kilobase single-stranded DNA that folds into a nanoscale octahedron
Shih, W. M., Quispe, J. D., & Joyce, G. F. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02307 · Cited by 989
Cited by
DNA Functional Materials Assembled from Branched DNA: Design, Synthesis, and Applications
Dong, Y., Yao, C., Zhu, Y., Yang, L., Luo, D., & Yang, D. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00294 · Cited by 533
Multilayer DNA Origami Packed on a Square Lattice
Ke, Y., Douglas, S. M., Liu, M., Sharma, J., Cheng, A., Leung, A., Liu, Y., Shih, W. M., & Yan, H. (2009) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja906381y · Cited by 414
Zhong, S., & Pochan, D. J. (2010) · Polymer Reviews · doi:10.1080/15583724.2010.493254 · Cited by 51
Local structural flexibility drives oligomorphism in computationally designed protein assemblies
Khmelinskaia, A., Bethel, N. P., Fatehi, F., Mallik, B. B., Antanasijevic, A., Borst, A. J., Lai, S.-H., Chim, H. Y., Wang, J. Y. ‘., Miranda, M. C., et al. (2025) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/s41594-025-01490-z · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, C., Su, M., He, Y., Zhao, X., Fang, P.-A., Ribbe, A. E., Jiang, W., & Mao, C.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2008-08-05
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 31
- Pages
- 10665-10669
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2003079583
- Cited by
- 288
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conformational flexibility facilitates self-assembly of complex DNA nanostructures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0803841105
- The paper
- Zhang, C., Su, M., He, Y., Zhao, X., Fang, P.-A., Ribbe, A. E., Jiang, W., & Mao, C. (2008). Conformational flexibility facilitates self-assembly of complex DNA nanostructures. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0803841105
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.