Targeting Nrf2 with the triterpenoid CDDO- imidazolide attenuates cigarette smoke-induced emphysema and cardiac dysfunction in mice
Open accessAbstract
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), which comprises emphysema and chronic bronchitis resulting from prolonged exposure to cigarette smoke (CS), is a major public health burden with no effective treatment. Emphysema is also associated with pulmonary hypertension, which can progress to right ventricular failure, an important cause of morbidity and mortality among patients with COPD. Nuclear erythroid 2 p45 related factor-2 (Nrf2) is a redox-sensitive transcription factor that up-regulates a battery of antioxidative genes and cytoprotective enzymes that constitute the defense against oxidative stress. Recently, it has been shown that patients with advanced COPD have a decline in expression of the Nrf2 pathway in lungs, suggesting that loss of this antioxidative protective response is a key factor in the pathophysiological progression of emphysema. Furthermore, genetic disruption of Nrf2 in mice causes early-onset and severe emphysema. The present study evaluated whether the strategy of activation of Nrf2 and its downstream network of cytoprotective genes with a small molecule would attenuate CS-induced oxidative stress and emphysema. Nrf2 +/+ and Nrf2 −/− mice were fed a diet containing the potent Nrf2 activator, 1-[2-cyano-3-,12-dioxooleana-1,9( 11 )-dien-28-oyl]imidazole (CDDO-Im), while being exposed to CS for 6 months. CDDO-Im significantly reduced lung oxidative stress, alveolar cell apoptosis, alveolar destruction, and pulmonary hypertension in Nrf2 +/+ mice caused by chronic exposure to CS. This protection from CS-induced emphysema depended on Nrf2, as Nrf2 −/− mice failed to show significant reduction in alveolar cell apoptosis and alveolar destruction after treatment with CDDO-Im. These results suggest that targeting the Nrf2 pathway during the etiopathogenesis of emphysema may represent an important approach for prophylaxis against COPD.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
CDDO has been shown to protect mice against cigarette smoke exposure through the Nrf2 mechanism.
“CDDO has been shown to protect mice against cigarette smoke exposure through the Nrf2 mechanism (Sussan et al. 2009).”
From Reactive Oxygen Species, Toxicity, Oxidative Stress, and Antioxidants: Chronic Diseases and Aging (2023) · cites this paper as Sussan et al. 2009
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 33 · Cited by 346
- Authors
- Sussan, T. E., Rangasamy, T., Blake, D. J., Malhotra, D., El-Haddad, H., Bedja, D., Yates, M. S., Kombairaju, P., Yamamoto, M., Liby, K. T., Sporn, M. B., Gabrielson, K. L., Champion, H. C., Tuder, R. M., Kensler, T. W., & Biswal, S.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Division of Cardiology,
- Tohoku University (JP)
- Dartmouth College (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2009-01-06
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 250-255
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC2629210
- OpenAlex
- W2016603108
- Cited by
- 346
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 33
- FWCI
- 25.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Foundation for Cancer Research
- Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America Foundation
- Flight Attendant Medical Research Institute
- National Institutes of Health
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL081205, HL 081205, R01HL066554, P50HL084945)
- National Cancer Institute (R01CA094076, CA 94076, R01CA078814, CA-78814, P30CA023108)
- National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (ES 07141, P50ES015903, ES03819, P30ES003819, T32ES007141)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics, phytochemicals, and oxidative stress
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Heme Oxygenase-1 and Carbon Monoxide
- Keywords
- Nrf2, cigarette smoke, emphysema, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, oxidative stress, pulmonary hypertension, right ventricular dysfunction, alveolar destruction, Nrf2 knockout mice, cytoprotective genes
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Heart Diseases, Hypertension, Pulmonary, Imidazoles, Nitric Oxide, Oleanolic Acid, Pulmonary Alveoli, Pulmonary Emphysema, Smoke, Drug Delivery Systems, Apoptosis, Mice, Knockout, Oxidative Stress, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, NF-E2-Related Factor 2, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review