The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Isoprene interferes with the attraction of bodyguards by herbaceous plants
Open accessAbstract
Isoprene is the most abundant volatile compound emitted by vegetation. It influences air chemistry and is part of plant defense against abiotic stresses. However, whether isoprene influences biotic interactions between plants and other organisms has not been investigated to date. Here we show a new effect of isoprene, namely its influence on interactions between plants and insects. Herbivory induces the release of plant volatiles that attract the herbivore's enemies, such as parasitic wasps, as a kind of bodyguard. We used transgenic isoprene-emitting Arabidopsis plants in behavioral, chemical, and electrophysiological studies to investigate the effects of isoprene on ecological interactions in 2 tritrophic systems. We demonstrate that isoprene is perceived by the chemoreceptors of the parasitic wasp Diadegma semiclausum and interferes with the attraction of this parasitic wasp to volatiles from herbivore-infested plants. We verified this repellent effect on D. semiclausum female wasps by adding external isoprene to the volatile blend of wild-type plants. In contrast, the antennae of the parasitic wasp Cotesia rubecula do not perceive isoprene and the behavior of this wasp was not altered by isoprene emission. In addition, the performance of the 2 examined lepidopteran herbivores ( Pieris rapae and Plutella xylostella ) was not affected by isoprene emission. Therefore, attraction of parasitic wasps to host-infested herbaceous plants in the neighborhood of high isoprene emitters, such as poplar or willow, may be hampered by the isoprene emission that repels plant bodyguards.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Chen, F., Tholl, D., Bohlmann, J., & Pichersky, E. (2011) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2011.04520.x · Cited by 1,446
Behavioural and community ecology of plants that cry for help
DICKE, M. (2009) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2008.01913.x · Cited by 337
Self-citationMARTI, G., ERB, M., BOCCARD, J., GLAUSER, G., DOYEN, G. R., VILLARD, N., ROBERT, C. A. M., TURLINGS, T. C. J., RUDAZ, S., & WOLFENDER, J. (2013) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/pce.12002 · Cited by 183
Metadata
- Authors
- Loivamäki, M., Mumm, R., Dicke, M., & Schnitzler, J.-P.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2008-11-11
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 45
- Pages
- 17430-17435
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2069099800
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Isoprene interferes with the attraction of bodyguards by herbaceous plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0804488105
- The paper
- Loivamäki, M., Mumm, R., Dicke, M., & Schnitzler, J.-P. (2008). Isoprene interferes with the attraction of bodyguards by herbaceous plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0804488105
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.