Shear-induced reorganization of renal proximal tubule cell actin cytoskeleton and apical junctional complexes
Open accessAbstract
In this study, we demonstrate that fluid shear stress (FSS)-induced actin cytoskeletal reorganization and junctional formation in renal epithelial cells are nearly completely opposite the corresponding changes in vascular endothelial cells (ECs) [Thi MM et al. (2004) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:16483–16488]. Mouse proximal tubule cells (PTCs) were subjected to 5 h of FSS (1 dyn/cm 2 ) to investigate the dynamic responses of the cytoskeletal distribution of filamentous actin (F-actin), ZO-1, E-cadherin, vinculin, and paxillin to FSS. Immunofluorescence analysis revealed that FSS caused basal stress fiber disruption, more densely distributed peripheral actin bands (DPABs), and the formation of both tight junctions (TJs) and adherens junctions (AJs). A dramatic reinforcement of vinculin staining was found at the cell borders as well as the cell interior. These responses were abrogated by the actin-disrupting drug, cytochalasin D. To interpret these results, we propose a “junctional buttressing” model for PTCs in which FSS enables the DPABs, TJs, and AJs to become more tightly connected. In contrast, in the “bumper-car” model for ECs, all junctional connections were severely disrupted by FSS. This “junctional buttressing” model explains why a FSS of only 1/10 of that used in the EC study can cause a similarly dramatic, cytoskeletal response in these tall, cuboidal epithelial cells; and why junctional buttressing between adjacent cells may benefit renal epithelium in maximizing flow-activated, brush border-dependent, transcellular salt and water reabsorption.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The axial fluid shear stress experienced by proximal tubule cells in vivo is estimated to be in the range of 0.1 to 1 dyne/cm2.
“the axial fluid shear stress experienced by proximal tubule cells in vivo is estimated to be in the range of 0.1 to 1 dyne/cm2”
From Material-dependent oxygen transport governs ischemia-reperfusion injury and drug response in a kidney microphysiological system (2026) · cites this paper as Duan et al., 2008
The Discussion (page unavailable in our copy) says that 1 dyn/cm² is typical of proximal tubule cells in vivo, supporting the upper end of the claimed range. It does not give 0.1 dyn/cm² as a lower bound or estimate an in vivo range of 0.1–1 dyn/cm². (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Organ-on-a chip systems: microengineering to biomimic living systems
Zheng, F., Fu, F., Cheng, Y., Wang, C., Zhao, Y., & Gu, Z. (2016) · Small · doi:10.1002/smll.201503208 · Cited by 338 · see citing works
Kutsuzawa, N., Nakamura, H., Shinha, K., & Kimura, H. (2026) · Frontiers in Toxicology · doi:10.3389/ftox.2026.1854389
- Authors
- Duan, Y., Gotoh, N., Yan, Q., Du, Z., Weinstein, A. M., Wang, T., & Weinbaum, S.
- Affiliations
- City College of New York (US)
- Yale University (US)
- Cornell University (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2008-08-12
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 32
- Pages
- 11418-11423
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC2516248
- OpenAlex
- W2020773684
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 3.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Yale University
- City University of New York
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK062289, R01DK029857, R01DK62289-01)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Cell Adhesion Molecules Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Skin and Cellular Biology Research
- Keywords
- fluid shear stress, proximal tubular epithelial cells, actin cytoskeleton, apical junctional complex, tight junctions, adherens junctions, stress fibers, ZO-1, E-cadherin, vinculin, paxillin, cytochalasin D, renal epithelium
- MeSH terms
- Absorption, Actins, Animals, Cells, Cultured, Cytoskeleton, Epithelial Cells, Kidney Tubules, Proximal, Membrane Proteins, Phosphoproteins, Stress, Mechanical, Cytochalasin D, Cadherins, Vinculin, Tight Junctions, Nucleic Acid Synthesis Inhibitors, Shear Strength, Mice, Paxillin, Zonula Occludens-1 Protein
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review