The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ecosystem services: From theory to implementation
Open accessAbstract
Around the world, leaders are increasingly recognizing ecosystems as natural capital assets that supply life-support services of tremendous value. The challenge is to turn this recognition into incentives and institutions that will guide wise investments in natural capital, on a large scale. Advances are required on three key fronts, each featured here: the science of ecosystem production functions and service mapping; the design of appropriate finance, policy, and governance systems; and the art of implementing these in diverse biophysical and social contexts. Scientific understanding of ecosystem production functions is improving rapidly but remains a limiting factor in incorporating natural capital into decisions, via systems of national accounting and other mechanisms. Novel institutional structures are being established for a broad array of services and places, creating a need and opportunity for systematic assessment of their scope and limitations. Finally, it is clear that formal sharing of experience, and defining of priorities for future work, could greatly accelerate the rate of innovation and uptake of new approaches.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Global Consequences of Land Use
Foley, J. A., DeFries, R., Asner, G. P., Barford, C., Bonan, G., Carpenter, S. R., Chapin, F. S., Coe, M. T., Daily, G. C., Gibbs, H. K., et al. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1111772 · Cited by 13,272
Self-citationGlobal Biodiversity Scenarios for the Year 2100
Sala, O. E., Stuart Chapin, F., III, Armesto, J. J., Berlow, E., Bloomfield, J., Dirzo, R., Huber-Sanwald, E., Huenneke, L. F., Jackson, R. B., et al. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.287.5459.1770 · Cited by 9,280
Agricultural Intensification and Ecosystem Properties
Matson, P. A., Parton, W. J., Power, A. G., & Swift, M. J. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.277.5325.504 · Cited by 3,160
Self-citationAn ecosystem services framework to support both practical conservation and economic development
Tallis, H., Kareiva, P., Marvier, M., & Chang, A. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0705797105 · Cited by 753
Research works printed but not linked: 16
- , eds R Hassan, R Scholes, N Ash (Island, Washington, DC Ecosystems and Human Well-Being, 2005).
- 10.1093/0199247889.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.1231335100 · DOI · Paper page
- J Salzman, Creating markets for ecosystem services: Notes from the field. NYU Law Rev 80, 870–961 (2005).
- JB Ruhl, SE Kraft, CL Lant The Law and Policy of Ecosystem Services (Island, Washington, DC, 2007).
- 10.1073/pnas.0800208105 · DOI
- F Berkes, C Folke Linking Social and Ecological Systems (Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK, 1998).
- E Ostrom Understanding Institutional Diversity (Princeton Univ Press, Princeton, 2005).
- GC Daily, K Ellison The New Economy of Nature (Island, Washington, DC, 2002).
- 10.1073/pnas.0708856105 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.0706178105 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.0707823105 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.0705503104 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.0706559105 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.0706905105 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.0706436105 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Accelerated modern human–induced species losses: Entering the sixth mass extinction
Ceballos, G., Ehrlich, P. R., Barnosky, A. D., García, A., Pringle, R. M., & Palmer, T. M. (2015) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1400253 · Cited by 4,220
Science for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment
Carpenter, S. R., Mooney, H. A., Agard, J., Capistrano, D., DeFries, R. S., Díaz, S., Dietz, T., Duraiappah, A. K., Oteng-Yeboah, A., Pereira, H. M., et al. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0808772106 · Cited by 2,257
Integrating local and scientific knowledge for environmental management
Raymond, C. M., Fazey, I., Reed, M. S., Stringer, L. C., Robinson, G. M., & Evely, A. C. (2010) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.03.023 · Cited by 1,116
Mapping ecosystem services for policy support and decision making in the European Union
Maes, J., Egoh, B., Willemen, L., Liquete, C., Vihervaara, P., Schägner, J. P., Grizzetti, B., Drakou, E. G., Notte, A. L., Zulian, G., et al. (2012) · Ecosystem Services · doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.06.004 · Cited by 939
Niemelä, J., Saarela, S.-R., Söderman, T., Kopperoinen, L., Yli-Pelkonen, V., Väre, S., & Kotze, D. J. (2010) · Biodiversity and Conservation · doi:10.1007/s10531-010-9888-8 · Cited by 555
Metadata
- Authors
- Daily, G. C., & Matson, P. A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2008-07-15
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 28
- Pages
- 9455-9456
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2140005563
- Cited by
- 852
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 31.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ecosystem services: From theory to implementation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0804960105
- The paper
- Daily, G. C., & Matson, P. A. (2008). Ecosystem services: From theory to implementation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0804960105
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
