Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 328

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cross-talk between GlcNAcylation and phosphorylation: Site-specific phosphorylation dynamics in response to globally elevated O -GlcNAc

Open access
Wang, Zihao, Gucek, Marjan, Hart, Gerald W.·2008·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Protein GlcNAcylation serves as a nutrient/stress sensor to modulate the functions of many nuclear and cytoplasmic proteins. O -GlcNAc cycles on serine or threonine residues like phosphorylation, is nearly as abundant, and functions, at least partially, via its interplay with phosphorylation. Here, we describe changes in site-specific phosphorylation dynamics in response to globally elevated GlcNAcylation. By combining sequential phospho-residue enrichment, iTRAQ labeling, and high throughput mass spectrometric analyses, phosphorylation dynamics on 711 phosphopeptides were quantified. Based upon their insensitivity to phosphatase inhibition, we conclude that ≈48% of these phosphorylation sites were not actively cycling in the conditions of the study. However, increased GlcNAcylation influenced phosphate stoichiometry at most of the sites that did appear to be actively cycling. Elevated GlcNAcylation resulted in lower phosphorylation at 280 sites and caused increased phosphorylation at 148 sites. Thus, the cross-talk or interplay between these two abundant posttranslational modifications is extensive, and may arises both by steric competition for occupancy at the same or proximal sites and by each modification regulating the other's enzymatic machinery. The phosphoproteome dynamics presented by this large set of quantitative data not only delineates the complex interplay between phosphorylation and GlcNAcyation, but also provides insights for more focused investigations of specific roles of O -GlcNAc in regulating protein functions and signaling pathways.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0806216105

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 328

Metadata

Authors
Wang, Z., Gucek, M., & Hart, G. W.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2008-09-16
Volume
105
Issue
37
Pages
13793-13798
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2158841256
Cited by
328
References
2
FWCI
9.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cross-talk between GlcNAcylation and phosphorylation: Site-specific phosphorylation dynamics in response to globally elevated O -GlcNAc. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0806216105
The paper
Wang, Z., Gucek, M., & Hart, G. W. (2008). Cross-talk between GlcNAcylation and phosphorylation: Site-specific phosphorylation dynamics in response to globally elevated O -GlcNAc. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0806216105

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.