Cited by 121DNA Repair MechanismsFungal and yeast genetics researchCancer-related Molecular Pathways

Dpb11 activates the Mec1-Ddc2 complex

Open access
Mordes, Daniel A., Nam, Edward A., Cortez, David·2008·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mec1–Ddc2 checkpoint kinase complex (the ortholog to human ATR-ATRIP) is an essential regulator of genomic integrity. The S. cerevisiae BRCT repeat protein Dpb11 functions in the initiation of both DNA replication and cell cycle checkpoints. Here, we report a genetic and physical interaction between Dpb11 and Mec1–Ddc2. A C-terminal domain of Dpb11 is sufficient to associate with Mec1–Ddc2 and strongly stimulates the kinase activity of Mec1 in a Ddc2-dependent manner. Furthermore, Mec1 phosphorylates Dpb11 and thereby amplifies the stimulating effect of Dpb11 on Mec1–Ddc2 kinase activity. Thus, Dpb11 is a functional ortholog of human TopBP1, and the Mec1/ATR activation mechanism is conserved from yeast to humans.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0806621105

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In S. cerevisiae, Mec1 can be activated by Ddc1 and by Dpb11 recruited through Ddc1.

    “In S. cerevisiae the Mec1 apical kinase can be activated both by the Ddc1 subunit of the checkpoint clamp and by the adaptor protein Dpb11 which is recruited at the lesion through interaction with Ddc1 [19–23].”

    From Mind the gap: keeping UV lesions in check (2011) · cites this paper as [23]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 121

Authors
Mordes, D. A., Nam, E. A., & Cortez, D.
Affiliations
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Cortez, David
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2008-12-02
Volume
105
Issue
48
Pages
18730-18734
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2015174686
Cited by
121
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 9
FWCI
5.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Defense
  • Vanderbilt University
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA102729)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32-GM 07347, T32GM007347)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
Keywords
Dpb11, BRCT domain, DNA replication initiation, DNA damage checkpoint, kinase activation, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, genome stability
MeSH terms
DNA Damage, DNA Repair, Enzyme Activation, Humans, Hydroxyurea, Phosphoproteins, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases, Cell Cycle Proteins, Nucleic Acid Synthesis Inhibitors, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins, Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review