Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact

Cited by (786)

Items 101–200 of 786

1. Citation Networks
   Filippo Radicchi, Santo Fortunato, Alessandro Vespignani · 2011 · Understanding complex systems
2. H-index and academic rank in general surgery and surgical specialties in the United States
   Awais Ashfaq, Roshini Kalagara, Nabil Wasif · 2018 · Journal of Surgical Research
3. The memory of science: Inflation, myopia, and the knowledge network
   Pan, Raj K., Petersen, Alexander M., Pammolli, Fabio, Fortunato, Santo · 2018 · Journal of Informetrics
4. Testing the fairness of citation indicators for comparison across scientific domains: The case of fractional citation counts
   Filippo Radicchi, Claudio Castellano · 2011 · Journal of Informetrics
5. A dataset of publication records for Nobel laureates
   Jichao Li, Yian Yin, Santo Fortunato, Dashun Wang · 2019 · Scientific Data
6. Analyzing linguistic complexity and scientific impact
   Chao Lu, Yi Bu, Xianlei Dong, Jie Wang, Ying Ding, Vincent Larivière, Cassidy R. Sugimoto, Logan Paul, Chengzhi Zhang · 2019 · Journal of Informetrics
7. Universality of citation distributions revisited
   Ludo Waltman, Nees Jan van Eck, Anthony F. J. van Raan · 2011 · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
8. On modeling and predicting individual paper citation count over time
   Shuai Xiao, Junchi Yan, Changsheng Li, Bo Jin, Xiangfeng Wang, Xiaokang Yang, Stephen Mingyu Chu, Hongyuan Zhu · 2016 · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
9. A multidimensional framework for characterizing the citation impact of scientific publications
   Yi Bu, Ludo Waltman, Yong Huang · 2021 · Quantitative Science Studies
10. Early identification of important patents: Design and validation of citation network metrics
    Manuel Sebastian Mariani, Matúš Medo, François Lafond · 2018 · Technological Forecasting and Social Change
11. The discretised lognormal and hooked power law distributions for complete citation data: Best options for modelling and regression
    Mike Thelwall · 2016 · Journal of Informetrics
12. A Multilevel Modelling Approach to Investigating the Predictive Validity of Editorial Decisions: Do the Editors of a High Profile Journal Select Manuscripts that are Highly Cited After Publication?
    Lutz Bornmann, Rüdiger Mutz, Werner Marx, Hermann Schier, Hans‐Dieter Daniel · 2011 · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society)
13. Predicting author h-index using characteristics of the co-author network
    Christopher McCarty, James W. Jawitz, Allison L. Hopkins, Alex Goldman · 2012 · Scientometrics
14. Comparison of the effect of mean-based method and z-score for field normalization of citations at the level of Web of Science subject categories
    Zhihui Zhang, Ying Cheng, Nian Cai Liu · 2014 · Scientometrics
15. Revisiting the scaling of citations for research assessment
    Giovanni Abramo, Tindaro Cicero, Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo · 2012 · Journal of Informetrics
16. Success and luck in creative careers
    Milán Janosov, Federico Battiston, Roberta Sinatra · 2020 · EPJ Data Science
17. Network science: a useful tool in economics and finance
    Dror Y. Kenett, Shlomo Havlin · 2015 · Mind & Society
18. Will This Paper Increase Your h-index? Scientific Impact Prediction
    Yuxiao Dong, Reid A. Johnson, Nitesh V. Chawla · 2014 · arXiv (Cornell University)
19. Untangling performance from success
    Burcu Yücesoy, Albert-Ĺaszló Barabási · 2016 · EPJ Data Science
20. Citing-side normalization of journal impact: A robust variant of the Audience Factor
    Michel Zitt · 2010 · Journal of Informetrics
21. A Measure of Total Research Impact Independent of Time and Discipline
    Alberto Pepe, Michael J. Kurtz · 2012 · PLoS ONE
22. Content, Contribution, and Knowledge Consumption: Uncovering Hidden Topic Structure and Rhetorical Signals in Scientific Texts
    David Antons, Amol M. Joshi, Torsten Oliver Salge · 2018 · Journal of Management
23. Interpreting correlations between citation counts and other indicators
    Mike A Thelwall · 2016 · Scientometrics
24. I Like, I Cite? Do Facebook Likes Predict the Impact of Scientific Work?
    Stefanie Ringelhan, Jutta Wollersheim, Isabell Melanie Welpe · 2015 · PLoS ONE
25. Global Multi-Level Analysis of the ‘Scientific Food Web'
    Amin Mazloumian, Dirk Helbing, Sergi Lozano, Robert P. Light, Katy Börner · 2013 · Scientific Reports
26. What happens when a journal converts to open access? A bibliometric analysis
    Fakhri Momeni, Philipp Mayr, Nicholas Fraser, Isabella Peters · 2021 · Scientometrics
27. The Spread of Scientific Information: Insights from the Web Usage Statistics in PLoS Article-Level Metrics
    Koon‐Kiu Yan, Mark Gerstein · 2011 · PLoS ONE
28. The precision of the arithmetic mean, geometric mean and percentiles for citation data: An experimental simulation modelling approach
    Mike A Thelwall · 2016 · Journal of Informetrics
29. An Overview on Evaluating and Predicting Scholarly Article Impact
    Xiaomei Bai, Hui Liu, Fuli Zhang, Zhaolong Ning, Xiangjie Kong, Ivan Lee, Feng Xia · 2017 · Information
30. Mining network-level properties of Twitter altmetrics data
    Anwar Said, Timothy D. Bowman, Rabeeh Ayaz Abbasi, Naif Radi Aljohani, Saeed‐Ul Hassan, Raheel Nawaz · 2019 · Scientometrics
31. When Politicians Talk: Assessing Online Conversational Practices of Political Parties on Twitter
    Lietz, Haiko, Wagner, Claudia, Bleier, Arnim, Strohmaier, Markus · 2014 · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
32. Power-law distribution of degree–degree distance: A better representation of the scale-free property of complex networks
    Bin Zhou, Xiangyi Meng, Eugene Stanley · 2020 · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
33. Decoding team and individual impact in science and invention
    Mohammad Ahmadpoor, Benjamin F. Jones · 2019 · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
34. How accurately does Thomas Kuhn’s model of paradigm change describe the transition from the static view of the universe to the big bang theory in cosmology?
    Werner Marx, Lutz Bornmann · 2009 · Scientometrics
35. Peer review in megajournals compared with traditional scholarly journals: Does it make a difference?
    Bo‐Christer Björk, Paul Catani · 2016 · Learned Publishing
36. Network-Driven Reputation in Online Scientific Communities
    Hao Liao, Rui Xiao, Giulio Cimini, Matúš Medo · 2014 · PLoS ONE
37. A Simple Index for the High-Citation Tail of Citation Distribution to Quantify Research Performance in Countries and Institutions
    Alonso Rodríguez‐Navarro · 2011 · PLoS ONE
38. Analysis of bibliometric indicators for individual scholars in a large data set
    Filippo Radicchi, Claudio Castellano · 2013 · Scientometrics
39. Universality of Citation Distributions for Academic Institutions and Journals
    Arnab Chatterjee, Asim Ghosh, Bikas K. Chakrabarti · 2016 · PLoS ONE
40. Taking census of physics
    Federico Battiston, Federico Musciotto, Dashun Wang, Albert-Ĺaszló Barabási, Michael Szell, Roberta Sinatra · 2018 · Nature Reviews Physics
41. Evaluating human versus machine learning performance in classifying research abstracts
    Yeow Chong Goh, Xin Cai, Walter Edgar Theseira, Giovanni Ko, Khiam Aik Khor · 2020 · Scientometrics
42. Grand Challenges and Emergent Modes of Convergence Science
    Alexander Michael Petersen, Mohammed Emtiaz Ahmed, Ioannis T. Pavlidis · 2020 · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
43. Stochastic Dynamical Model of a Growing Citation Network Based on a Self-Exciting Point Process
    M. Golosovsky, Sorin Solomon · 2012 · Physical Review Letters
44. Co-word analysis and thematic landscapes in Spanish information science literature, 1985–2014
    Carlos Olmeda‐Gómez, María-Antonia Ovalle-Perandones, Antonio Perianes‐Rodríguez · 2017 · Scientometrics
45. Quantifying global digital journalism research: a bibliometric landscape
    Sumit Kumar Banshal, Manoj Kumar Verma, Mayank Yuvaraj · 2022 · Library Hi Tech
46. The Measurement of the Effect on Citation Inequality of Differences in Citation Practices across Scientific Fields
    Juan A. Crespo, Yungrong Li, Javier Ruiz‐Castillo · 2013 · PLoS ONE
47. The journal impact factor: angel, devil, or scapegoat? A comment on J.K. Vanclay’s article 2011
    Michel Zitt · 2012 · Scientometrics
48. Exploring cost-benefit analysis of research, development and innovation infrastructures: an evaluation framework
    Massimo Florio, Stefano Forte, Chiara Pancotti, Emanuela Sirtori, Silvia Vignetti · 2016 · arXiv (Cornell University)
49. The Sci-Hub effect on papers’ citations
    Juan Carlos Correa, Henry Laverde-Rojas, Julián Tejada, Fernando Marmolejo‐Ramos · 2021 · Scientometrics
50. Quantitative evaluation of alternative field normalization procedures
    Yunrong Li, Filippo Radicchi, Claudio Castellano, Javier Ruiz‐Castillo · 2013 · Journal of Informetrics
51. A data analytic approach to quantifying scientific impact
    Xuanyu Cao, Yan Chen, K. J. Ray Liu · 2016 · Journal of Informetrics
52. Journal influence factors
    Massimo Franceschet · 2010 · Journal of Informetrics
53. Do social sciences and humanities behave like life and hard sciences?
    Andrea J. Bonaccorsi, Cinzia C. Daraio, Stefano Fantoni, Viola Folli, Marco Leonetti, Giancarlo Ruocco · 2017 · Scientometrics
54. Ranking scientists
    Sergey N. Dorogovtsev, José F. F. Mendes · 2015 · Nature Physics
55. Will This Paper Increase Your h -index?
    Yuxiao Dong, Reid A. Johnson, Nitesh V. Chawla · 2015 · ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM)
56. Distributions for Cited Articles from Individual Subjects and Years 1
    Mike A Thelwall, Paul Wilson · 2014
57. Modelling citation networks
    Sophia R. Goldberg, Hannah Anthony, Tim Evans · 2015 · Scientometrics
58. How to normalize Twitter counts? A first attempt based on journals in the Twitter Index
    Lutz Bornmann, Robin Haunschild · 2016 · Scientometrics
59. The time dimension of science: Connecting the past to the future
    Yian Yin, Dashun Wang · 2017 · Journal of Informetrics
60. The Distribution of the Asymptotic Number of Citations to Sets of Publications by a Researcher or from an Academic Department Are Consistent with a Discrete Lognormal Model
    João A. G. Moreira, Xiao Han T. Zeng, Luı́s A. Nunes Amaral · 2015 · PLoS ONE
61. A measure for the impact of research
    Alejandro M. Aragón · 2013 · Scientific Reports
62. Percentile Rank and Author Superiority Indexes for Evaluating Individual Journal Articles and the Author’s Overall Citation Performance
    A. I. Pudovkin, Eugene Garfield · 2009 · Collnet Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management
63. Ranking scientific publications: the effect of nonlinearity
    Liyang Yao, Tian Wei, An Zeng, Ying Fan, Zengru Di · 2014 · Scientific Reports
64. Heuristics, Interactions, and Status Hierarchies
    Gianluca Manzo, Delia Baldassarri · 2014 · Sociological Methods & Research
65. Quantifying and suppressing ranking bias in a large citation network
    Giacomo Vaccario, Matúš Medo, Nicolas Wider, Manuel Sebastian Mariani · 2017 · Journal of Informetrics
66. Uncertainty and Risk-Taking in Science: Meaning, Measurement and Management
    Chiara Franzoni, Paula E. Stephan · 2021 · Research Policy
67. Distributions for cited articles from individual subjects and years
    Mike Thelwall, Paul Wilson · 2014 · Journal of Informetrics
68. Lognormal Infection Times of Online Information Spread
    Christian Doerr, Norbert Blenn, Piet Van Mieghem · 2013 · PLoS ONE
69. Cross-evaluation of metrics to estimate the significance of creative works
    Max Wasserman, Xiao Han T. Zeng, Luı́s A. Nunes Amaral · 2015 · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
70. Measuring Scholarly Impact Using Modern Citation-Based Indices
    John Ruscio, Florence Seaman, Carianne D’Oriano, Elena Stremlo, Krista Mahalchik · 2012 · Measurement Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives
71. The relative citation ratio: what is it and why should medical librarians care?
    Alisa Surkis, Stuart Spore · 2018 · Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLA
72. Ranking scientific publications with similarity-preferential mechanism
    Jianlin Zhou, An Zeng, Ying Fan, Zengru Di · 2015 · Scientometrics
73. Fame and obsolescence: Disentangling growth and aging dynamics of patent citations
    Kyle Higham, Michele Governale, Adam B. Jaffe, Ulrich Zülicke · 2017 · Physical review. E
74. Inequality and cumulative advantage in science careers: a case study of high-impact journals
    Alexander Michael Petersen, Orion Penner · 2014 · EPJ Data Science
75. What Are the 100 Most Cited Articles in Business and Management Education Research, and What Do They Tell Us?
    J. B. Arbaugh, Alvin Hwang · 2015 · Organization Management Journal
76. Citation score normalized by cited references (CSNCR): The introduction of a new citation impact indicator
    Lutz Bornmann, Robin Haunschild · 2016 · Journal of Informetrics
77. Newspaper Consumption in the Mobile Age
    Neil Thurman · 2017 · Journalism Studies
78. Publication incentives undermine the utility of science: Ecological research in Mexico
    Mark William Neff · 2017 · Science and Public Policy
79. Explore with caution: mapping the evolution of scientific interest in physics
    Alberto Aleta, Sandro Meloni, Nicola Perra, Yamir Moreno · 2019 · EPJ Data Science
80. How to create an innovation accelerator
    Dirk Helbing, Stefano Balietti · 2011 · The European Physical Journal Special Topics
81. Quality versus quantity in scientific impact
    Jasleen Kaur, Emilio Ferrara, Filippo Menczer, Alessandro Flammini, Filippo Radicchi · 2015 · Journal of Informetrics
82. Measuring Long-Term Impact Based on Network Centrality: Unraveling Cinematic Citations
    Andreas Spitz, Emőke-Ágnes Horvát · 2014 · PLoS ONE
83. Scaling up real networks by geometric branching growth
    Muhua Zheng, Guillermo García-Pérez, Marián Boguñá, M. Ángeles Serrano · 2021 · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
84. Critical Rationalism and the Search for Standard (Field-Normalized) Indicators in Bibliometrics
    Bornmann, Lutz, Marx, Werner · 2018 · Journal of Informetrics
85. In science “there is no bad publicity”: Papers criticized in comments have high scientific impact
    Filippo Radicchi · 2012 · Scientific Reports
86. Three dimensions of scientific impact
    Grzegorz Siudem, Barbara Żogała-Siudem, Anna Cena, Marek Ga̧golewski · 2020 · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
87. The statistical laws of popularity: universal properties of the box-office dynamics of motion pictures
    Raj Kumar Pan, Sitabhra Sinha A · 2010 · New Journal of Physics
88. Exploration into the evolution and historical roots of citation analysis by referenced publication year spectroscopy
    Jianhua Hou · 2017 · Scientometrics
89. Universality of performance indicators based on citation and reference counts
    Tim Evans, Nicola Hopkins, Ben Kaube · 2012 · Scientometrics
90. Article age- and field-normalized tools to evaluate scientific impact and momentum
    Edgar Dutra Zanotto, Vinícius Gustavo Rocha Lima de Carvalho · 2021 · Scientometrics
91. Hirsch‐Type Index Values for Organic Chemistry Journals: A Comparison of New Metrics with the Journal Impact Factor
    Lutz Bornmann, Werner Marx, Hermann Schier · 2009 · European Journal of Organic Chemistry
92. The Usefulness of Peer Review for Selecting Manuscripts for Publication: A Utility Analysis Taking as an Example a High-Impact Journal
    Lutz Bornmann, Hans‐Dieter Daniel · 2010 · PLoS ONE
93. Lognormal distribution in the digg online social network
    Piet Van Mieghem, Norbert Blenn, Christian Doerr · 2011 · The European Physical Journal B
94. Scholarometer: A Social Framework for Analyzing Impact across Disciplines
    Jasleen Kaur, Diep Thi Hoang, Xiaoling Sun, Lino Possamai, Mohsen JafariAsbagh, Snehal B. Patil, Filippo Menczer · 2012 · PLoS ONE
95. Patent citation network analysis: A perspective from descriptive statistics and ERGMs
    Manajit Chakraborty, Maksym Byshkin, Fábio Crestani · 2020 · PLoS ONE
96. Ranking de revistas científicas en Latinoamérica mediante el índice h: estudio de caso Colombia
    Mauricio Romero‐Torres, Alberto Acosta, María Alejandra Tejada-Gómez · 2013 · Revista española de Documentación Científica
97. Relative clock verifies endogenous bursts of human dynamics
    Tao Zhou, Zhi-Dan Zhao, Zimo Yang, Changsong Zhou · 2012 · Europhysics Letters (EPL)
98. Empirical analysis of online human dynamics
    Zhi-Dan Zhao, Tao Zhou · 2012 · Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications
99. Zipf’s law and log-normal distributions in measures of scientific output across fields and institutions: 40 years of Slovenia’s research as an example
    Matjaž Perc · 2010 · Journal of Informetrics
100. Ranking authors using fractional counting of citations: An axiomatic approach
     Denis Bouyssou, Thierry Marchant · 2016 · Journal of Informetrics