Interactions between zebrafish pigment cells responsible for the generation of Turing patterns
Open accessAbstract
The reaction–diffusion system is one of the most studied nonlinear mechanisms that generate spatially periodic structures autonomous. On the basis of many mathematical studies using computer simulations, it is assumed that animal skin patterns are the most typical examples of the Turing pattern (stationary periodic pattern produced by the reaction–diffusion system). However, the mechanism underlying pattern formation remains unknown because the molecular or cellular basis of the phenomenon has yet to be identified. In this study, we identified the interaction network between the pigment cells of zebrafish, and showed that this interaction network possesses the properties necessary to form the Turing pattern. When the pigment cells in a restricted region were killed with laser treatment, new pigment cells developed to regenerate the striped pattern. We also found that the development and survival of the cells were influenced by the positioning of the surrounding cells. When melanophores and xanthophores were located at adjacent positions, these cells excluded one another. However, melanophores required a mass of xanthophores distributed in a more distant region for both differentiation and survival. Interestingly, the local effect of these cells is opposite to that of their effects long range. This relationship satisfies the necessary conditions required for stable pattern formation in the reaction–diffusion model. Simulation calculations for the deduced network generated wild-type pigment patterns as well as other mutant patterns. Our findings here allow further investigation of Turing pattern formation within the context of cell biology.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The self-organizing properties of pigment cell interactions are revealed by perturbations, with cellular responses that regenerate, reposition, or even reorient the pattern.
“Yet the self-organizing properties of pigment cell interactions are revealed by perturbations, with cellular responses that regenerate, reposition, or even reorient the pattern (7, 8).”
From Agouti and BMP signaling drive a naturally occurring fate conversion of melanophores to leucophores in zebrafish (2025) · cites this paper as [7]
The Results describe laser-ablation experiments in which pigment cells regenerate and melanophores develop in a region previously occupied by xanthophores. The paper’s introductory section also says regenerated patterns sometimes change conformation, supporting self-organization after perturbation. It does not specifically establish that a pattern reorients. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Mathematical Biology: II: Spatial Models and Biomedical Applications
(2003) · Interdisciplinary Applied Mathematics · doi:10.1007/b98869 · Cited by 2,293 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [15]Meinhardt H (2003) The Algorithmic Beauty of Sea Shells (Springer, New York).
- [25]Westerfield M (2003) The Zebrafish Book (Univ of Oregon Press, Eugene, OR).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Advancing biology through a deeper understanding of zebrafish ecology and evolution.
Parichy, D. M. (2015) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.05635 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Huang, D., Kapadia, E. H., Liang, Y., Shriver, L. P., Dai, S., Patti, G. J., Humbel, B. M., Laudet, V., & Parichy, D. M. (2025) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2424180122 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
- Authors
- Nakamasu, A., Takahashi, G., Kanbe, A., & Kondo, S.
- Affiliations
- Nagoya University (JP)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2009-05-26
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 8429-8434
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC2689028
- OpenAlex
- W2017296776
- Cited by
- 367
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 21
- FWCI
- 5.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › melanin and skin pigmentation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications
- Keywords
- Turing patterns, reaction-diffusion systems, zebrafish, pigment cells, melanophores, xanthophores, cell-cell interaction networks, cell differentiation, cell survival, laser ablation, cell positioning
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cell Survival, Lasers, Melanophores, Pigmentation, Zebrafish
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review