The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The mosaic genome structure of the Wolbachia w Ri strain infecting Drosophila simulans
Open accessAbstract
The obligate intracellular bacterium Wolbachia pipientis infects around 20% of all insect species. It is maternally inherited and induces reproductive alterations of insect populations by male killing, feminization, parthenogenesis, or cytoplasmic incompatibility. Here, we present the 1,445,873-bp genome of W. pipientis strain w Ri that induces very strong cytoplasmic incompatibility in its natural host Drosophila simulans . A comparison with the previously sequenced genome of W. pipientis strain w Mel from Drosophila melanogaster identified 35 breakpoints associated with mobile elements and repeated sequences that are stable in Drosophila lines transinfected with w Ri. Additionally, 450 genes with orthologs in w Ri and w Mel were sequenced from the W. pipientis strain w Uni, responsible for the induction of parthenogenesis in the parasitoid wasp Muscidifurax uniraptor . The comparison of these A-group Wolbachia strains uncovered the most highly recombining intracellular bacterial genomes known to date. This was manifested in a 500-fold variation in sequence divergences at synonymous sites, with different genes and gene segments supporting different strain relationships. The substitution-frequency profile resembled that of Neisseria meningitidis , which is characterized by rampant intraspecies recombination, rather than that of Rickettsia , where genes mostly diverge by nucleotide substitutions. The data further revealed diversification of ankyrin repeat genes by short tandem duplications and provided examples of horizontal gene transfer across A- and B-group strains that infect D. simulans . These results suggest that the transmission dynamics of Wolbachia and the opportunity for coinfections have created a freely recombining intracellular bacterial community with mosaic genomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Base-Calling of Automated Sequencer Traces Using Phred. II. Error Probabilities
Ewing, B., & Green, P. (1998) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.8.3.186 · Cited by 5,439
Versatile and open software for comparing large genomes
Kurtz, S., Phillippy, A., Delcher, A. L., Smoot, M., Shumway, M., Antonescu, C., & Salzberg, S. L. (2004) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2004-5-2-r12 · Cited by 5,254
Wu, M., Sun, L. V., Vamathevan, J., Riegler, M., Deboy, R., Brownlie, J. C., McGraw, E. A., Martin, W., Esser, C., Ahmadinejad, N., et al. (2004) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020069 · Cited by 851 · cited 2×
“These genomes have a large repertoire of genes with ankyrin repeat motifs, 23 in wMel and 60 in wPip, several of which are associated with mobile elements (6, 7).”
Background
Cited by
Evolutionary microbial genomics: insights into bacterial host adaptation
Toft, C., & Andersson, S. G. E. (2010) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2798 · Cited by 432
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Klasson, L., Westberg, J., Sapountzis, P., Näslund, K., Lutnaes, Y., Darby, A. C., Veneti, Z., Chen, L., Braig, H. R., Garrett, R., Bourtzis, K., & Andersson, S. G. E.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2009-04-07
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 5725-5730
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2008430614
- Cited by
- 242
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 31.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The mosaic genome structure of the Wolbachia w Ri strain infecting Drosophila simulans. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0810753106
- The paper
- Klasson, L., Westberg, J., Sapountzis, P., Näslund, K., Lutnaes, Y., Darby, A. C., Veneti, Z., Chen, L., Braig, H. R., Garrett, R., Bourtzis, K., & Andersson, S. G. E. (2009). The mosaic genome structure of the Wolbachia w Ri strain infecting Drosophila simulans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0810753106
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.