Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 242

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The mosaic genome structure of the Wolbachia w Ri strain infecting Drosophila simulans

Open access
Klasson, Lisa, Westberg, Joakim, Sapountzis, Panagiotis, Näslund, Kristina, Lutnaes, Ylva, Darby, Alistair C., Veneti, Zoe, Chen, Lanming, Braig, Henk R., Garrett, Roger, Bourtzis, Kostas, Andersson, Siv G. E.·2009·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The obligate intracellular bacterium Wolbachia pipientis infects around 20% of all insect species. It is maternally inherited and induces reproductive alterations of insect populations by male killing, feminization, parthenogenesis, or cytoplasmic incompatibility. Here, we present the 1,445,873-bp genome of W. pipientis strain w Ri that induces very strong cytoplasmic incompatibility in its natural host Drosophila simulans . A comparison with the previously sequenced genome of W. pipientis strain w Mel from Drosophila melanogaster identified 35 breakpoints associated with mobile elements and repeated sequences that are stable in Drosophila lines transinfected with w Ri. Additionally, 450 genes with orthologs in w Ri and w Mel were sequenced from the W. pipientis strain w Uni, responsible for the induction of parthenogenesis in the parasitoid wasp Muscidifurax uniraptor . The comparison of these A-group Wolbachia strains uncovered the most highly recombining intracellular bacterial genomes known to date. This was manifested in a 500-fold variation in sequence divergences at synonymous sites, with different genes and gene segments supporting different strain relationships. The substitution-frequency profile resembled that of Neisseria meningitidis , which is characterized by rampant intraspecies recombination, rather than that of Rickettsia , where genes mostly diverge by nucleotide substitutions. The data further revealed diversification of ankyrin repeat genes by short tandem duplications and provided examples of horizontal gene transfer across A- and B-group strains that infect D. simulans . These results suggest that the transmission dynamics of Wolbachia and the opportunity for coinfections have created a freely recombining intracellular bacterial community with mosaic genomes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0810753106

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 242

Metadata

Authors
Klasson, L., Westberg, J., Sapountzis, P., Näslund, K., Lutnaes, Y., Darby, A. C., Veneti, Z., Chen, L., Braig, H. R., Garrett, R., Bourtzis, K., & Andersson, S. G. E.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2009-04-07
Volume
106
Issue
14
Pages
5725-5730
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2008430614
Cited by
242
References
3
FWCI
31.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The mosaic genome structure of the Wolbachia w Ri strain infecting Drosophila simulans. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0810753106
The paper
Klasson, L., Westberg, J., Sapountzis, P., Näslund, K., Lutnaes, Y., Darby, A. C., Veneti, Z., Chen, L., Braig, H. R., Garrett, R., Bourtzis, K., & Andersson, S. G. E. (2009). The mosaic genome structure of the Wolbachia w Ri strain infecting Drosophila simulans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0810753106

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.