Cited by 211Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies ResearchT-cell and B-cell ImmunologyDrug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms

Conditional deletion of the MHC class I-related receptor FcRn reveals the sites of IgG homeostasis in mice

Open access
Montoyo, Héctor Pérez, Vaccaro, Carlos, Hafner, Martin, Ober, Raimund J., Mueller, Werner, Ward, E. Sally·2009·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The MHC class I-related receptor FcRn regulates the levels and persistence of IgG in vivo. This receptor salvages IgG from lysosomal degradation within cells, and the binding properties of an IgG for FcRn correlate with in vivo half-life. FcRn is expressed at multiple different sites throughout adult life. However, the cell types and sites at which FcRn maintains IgG homeostasis are not well defined. Toward understanding the sites of FcRn function, we have generated a mouse strain in which this Fc receptor can be conditionally deleted. In combination with mice that express Cre recombinase under the control of the Tie2 promoter (Tie2-Cre), the effect of site-specific deletion of floxed FcRn in endothelial and hematopoietic cells on IgG persistence was analyzed. The pharmacokinetics and steady-state levels of IgG in Tie2-Cre mice that are homozygous for the floxed FcRn allele reveal a complete loss of FcRn function in regulating the half-lives of wild-type IgG. The primary sites for the maintenance of endogenous IgGs in mice are therefore endothelial and hematopoietic cells.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0810796106

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Endothelial cells are regarded as the major site for IgG salvage in vivo.

    “The current study has focused on the behavior of FcRn inhibitors in endothelial cells, since those cells are regarded as the major site for IgG salvage in vivo [3,4].”

    From The uptake, intracellular trafficking and recycling of FcRn-blocking therapeutics in human endothelial cells in vitro (2026) · cites this paper as [3]

    The Discussion (page not specified) says endothelial cells make an important contribution to maintaining IgG levels in mice. It identifies endothelial and hematopoietic cells together as the primary cell types controlling IgG clearance, rather than establishing endothelial cells alone as the major site of salvage. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [39]Torres RM, Kuhn R (2008) Laboratory Protocols for Conditional Gene Targeting (Oxford Univ Press, New York).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Montoyo, H. P., Vaccaro, C., Hafner, M., Ober, R. J., Mueller, W., & Ward, E. S.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
  • Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research (DE)
  • The University of Texas at Dallas (US)
  • Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Braunschweig 38124, Germany;
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2009-02-24
Volume
106
Issue
8
Pages
2788-2793
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2138611681
Cited by
211
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 11
FWCI
8.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM071048, R01 GM71048)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI039167, R01 AI39167)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
Keywords
neonatal Fc receptor, IgG half-life, conditional gene deletion, Tie2-Cre, endothelial cells, hematopoietic cells, lysosomal degradation, pharmacokinetics
MeSH terms
Animals, Bone Marrow Cells, Endothelium, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Immunoglobulin G, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Receptors, Fc, Histocompatibility Antigens Class I, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Gene Deletion, Surface Plasmon Resonance, Receptor, TIE-1, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review