The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Modular organization of internal models of tools in the human cerebellum
Open accessAbstract
Human capabilities in manipulating many different tools with dexterity suggest modular neural organization at functional levels, but anatomical modularity underlying the capabilities has yet to be demonstrated. Although modularity in phylogenetically older parts of the cerebellum is well known, comparable modularity in the lateral cerebellum for cognitive functions remains unknown. We investigated these issues by functional MRI (fMRI) based on our previous findings of a cerebellar internal model of a tool. After subjects intensively learned to manipulate two novel tools (the rotated mouse whose cursor appeared at a rotated position, and the velocity mouse whose cursor velocity was proportional to the mouse position), they could easily switch between the two. The lateral and posterior cerebellar activities for the two different tools were spatially segregated, and their overlaps were <10%, even at low statistical thresholds. Activities of the rotated mouse were more anterior and lateral than the velocity mouse activities. These results were consistent with predictions by the MOdular Selection And Identification Controller (MOSAIC) model that multiple internal models compete to partition sensory-motor experiences and their outputs are linearly combined for a particular context.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Brain loops might extend beyond the striatum and include, for example, the cerebellum, which – given its remarkably homogenous microarchitecture – has been often assumed to be able to encode a large repertoire of internal (generative) models required to predict and control action and its timing (Caligiore et al., 2013, Imamizu et al., 2003, Miall and Wolpert, 1996, Wolpert et al., 1998).”
From Active Inference, homeostatic regulation and adaptive behavioural control (2015) · cites this paper as Imamizu et al., 2003
Citations
Cites
The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory
Oldfield, R. C. (1971) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4 · Cited by 35,900
(1982) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/0166-2236(82)90076-5 · Cited by 9,150
Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions
Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Gallese, V., & Fogassi, L. (1996) · Cognitive Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0926-6410(95)00038-0 · Cited by 4,870
PENFIELD, W., & BOLDREY, E. (1937) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/60.4.389 · Cited by 4,188
An internal model for sensorimotor integration
Wolpert, D. M., Ghahramani, Z., & Jordan, M. I. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7569931 · Cited by 3,553
Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task
Shadmehr, R., & Mussa-Ivaldi, F. (1994) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.14-05-03208.1994 · Cited by 2,612
Internal models in the cerebellum
Wolpert, D. M., Miall, R. C., & Kawato, M. (1998) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(98)01221-2 · Cited by 2,469
Self-citationMultiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control
Wolpert, D. M., & Kawato, M. (1998) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/s0893-6080(98)00066-5 · Cited by 2,244
Self-citationAnalysis of fMRI Time-Series Revisited—Again
Worsley, K. J., & Friston, K. J. (1995) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.1995.1023 · Cited by 2,198
Computational principles of movement neuroscience
Wolpert, D. M., & Ghahramani, Z. (2000) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/81497 · Cited by 2,122
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- S Paradiso, N C Andreasen, D S O'Leary, S Arndt, R G Robinson Neuropsychiat Neuropsychol Behav Neurol 10, 1–8 (1997).
- M Ito The Cerebellum and Neural Motor Control (Raven, New York, 1984).
- S Higuchi, H Imamizu, M Kawato NeuroImage 16, s847 (2002).
- D Purves Neuroscience (Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, 2001).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Consensus Paper: The Cerebellum's Role in Movement and Cognition
Koziol, L. F., Budding, D. E., Andreasen, N. C., D’Arrigo, S., Bulgheroni, S., Imamizu, H., Ito, M., Manto, M. U., Marvel, C. L., Parker, K. L., et al. (2013) · The Cerebellum · doi:10.1007/s12311-013-0511-x · Cited by 1,193
Self-citationReorganization and plasticity in the adult brain during learning of motor skills
Doyon, J., & Benali, H. (2005) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2005.03.004 · Cited by 1,028
Contributions of the basal ganglia and functionally related brain structures to motor learning
Doyon, J., Bellec, P., Amsel, R., Penhune, V., Monchi, O., Carrier, J., Lehéricy, S., & Benali, H. (2009) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2008.11.012 · Cited by 783
The neural bases of complex tool use in humans
Johnson-Frey, S. H. (2003) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2003.12.002 · Cited by 697
Active Inference, homeostatic regulation and adaptive behavioural control
Pezzulo, G., Rigoli, F., & Friston, K. (2015) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2015.09.001 · Cited by 650
“…– given its remarkably homogenous microarchitecture – has been often assumed to be able to encode a large repertoire of internal (generative) models required to predict and control action and its timing (Caligiore et al., 2013; Imamizu et al., 2003; Miall and Wolpert, 1996; Wolpert et al., 1998).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Imamizu, H., Kuroda, T., Miyauchi, S., Yoshioka, T., & Kawato, M.
- Affiliations
- Advanced Telecommunications Research Institute International (JP)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2003-04-18
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 5461-5466
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC154367
- OpenAlex
- W2110514514
- Cited by
- 334
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 8.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
- Keywords
- cerebellum, internal models, tool handling, lateral cerebellum, posterior cerebellum, tool switching, mosaic model, sensorimotor learning, functional segregation
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Animals, Cerebellum, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Models, Biological, Regression Analysis, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
