The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Plants with double genomes might have had a better chance to survive the Cretaceous–Tertiary extinction event
Open accessAbstract
Most flowering plants have been shown to be ancient polyploids that have undergone one or more whole genome duplications early in their evolution. Furthermore, many different plant lineages seem to have experienced an additional, more recent genome duplication. Starting from paralogous genes lying in duplicated segments or identified in large expressed sequence tag collections, we dated these youngest duplication events through penalized likelihood phylogenetic tree inference. We show that a majority of these independent genome duplications are clustered in time and seem to coincide with the Cretaceous–Tertiary (KT) boundary. The KT extinction event is the most recent mass extinction caused by one or more catastrophic events such as a massive asteroid impact and/or increased volcanic activity. These events are believed to have generated global wildfires and dust clouds that cut off sunlight during long periods of time resulting in the extinction of ≈60% of plant species, as well as a majority of animals, including dinosaurs. Recent studies suggest that polyploid species can have a higher adaptability and increased tolerance to different environmental conditions. We propose that polyploidization may have contributed to the survival and propagation of several plant lineages during or following the KT extinction event. Due to advantages such as altered gene expression leading to hybrid vigor and an increased set of genes and alleles available for selection, polyploid plants might have been better able to adapt to the drastically changed environment 65 million years ago.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Relaxed Phylogenetics and Dating with Confidence
Drummond, A. J., Ho, S. Y. W., Phillips, M. J., & Rambaut, A. (2006) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040088 · Cited by 6,463
The Evolutionary Fate and Consequences of Duplicate Genes
Lynch, M., & Conery, J. S. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.290.5494.1151 · Cited by 4,988
Sanderson, M. J. (2002) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003974 · Cited by 1,977
Sanderson, M. J. (2003) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/19.2.301 · Cited by 1,906
Divergence time and evolutionary rate estimation with multilocus data.
Thorne, J. L., & Kishino, H. (2002) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635150290102456 · Cited by 962
A Recent Polyploidy Superimposed on Older Large-Scale Duplications in the Arabidopsis Genome
Blanc, G., Hokamp, K., & Wolfe, K. H. (2003) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.751803 · Cited by 724
Performance of a divergence time estimation method under a probabilistic model of rate evolution.
Kishino, H., Thorne, J. L., & Bruno, W. J. (2001) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003811 · Cited by 633
Inferring speciation times under an episodic molecular clock
Rannala, B., & Yang, Z. (2007) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635150701420643 · Cited by 475
Liu, Z., & Adams, K. L. (2007) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2007.08.030 · Cited by 156
Cited by
The genome of the domesticated apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.)
Velasco, R., Zharkikh, A., Affourtit, J., Dhingra, A., Cestaro, A., Kalyanaraman, A., Fontana, P., Bhatnagar, S. K., Troggio, M., Pruss, D., et al. (2010) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.654 · Cited by 2,075
Self-citationGenome sequence and analysis of the tuber crop potato
The Potato Genome Sequencing Consortium (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10158 · Cited by 2,065
The evolutionary significance of ancient genome duplications
Van de Peer, Y., Maere, S., & Meyer, A. (2009) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2600 · Cited by 1,129
Self-citationThe genome of the pear (Pyrus bretschneideri Rehd.)
Wu, J., Wang, Z., Shi, Z., Zhang, S., Ming, R., Zhu, S., Khan, M. A., Tao, S., Korban, S. S., Wang, H., et al. (2013) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.144311.112 · Cited by 1,037
The draft genome of a diploid cotton Gossypium raimondii
Wang, K., Wang, Z., Li, F., Ye, W., Wang, J., Song, G., Yue, Z., Cong, L., Shang, H., Zhu, S., et al. (2012) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.2371 · Cited by 1,009
Metadata
- Authors
- Fawcett, J. A., Maere, S., & Van de Peer, Y.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2009-04-07
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 5737-5742
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2152650625
- Cited by
- 679
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 49.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Plants with double genomes might have had a better chance to survive the Cretaceous–Tertiary extinction event. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0900906106
- The paper
- Fawcett, J. A., Maere, S., & Van de Peer, Y. (2009). Plants with double genomes might have had a better chance to survive the Cretaceous–Tertiary extinction event. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0900906106
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.