The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reconstructing web evolution and spider diversification in the molecular era
Open accessAbstract
The evolutionary diversification of spiders is attributed to spectacular innovations in silk. Spiders are unique in synthesizing many different kinds of silk, and using silk for a variety of ecological functions throughout their lives, particularly to make prey-catching webs. Here, we construct a broad higher-level phylogeny of spiders combining molecular data with traditional morphological and behavioral characters. We use this phylogeny to test the hypothesis that the spider orb web evolved only once. We then examine spider diversification in relation to different web architectures and silk use. We find strong support for a single origin of orb webs, implying a major shift in the spinning of capture silk and repeated loss or transformation of orb webs. We show that abandonment of costly cribellate capture silk correlates with the 2 major diversification events in spiders ( 1 ). Replacement of cribellate silk by aqueous silk glue may explain the greater diversity of modern orb-weaving spiders (Araneoidea) compared with cribellate orb-weaving spiders (Deinopoidea) ( 2 ). Within the “RTA clade,” which is the sister group to orb-weaving spiders and contains half of all spider diversity, >90% of species richness is associated with repeated loss of cribellate silk and abandonment of prey capture webs. Accompanying cribellum loss in both groups is a release from substrate-constrained webs, whether by aerially suspended webs, or by abandoning webs altogether. These behavioral shifts in silk and web production by spiders thus likely played a key role in the dramatic evolutionary success and ecological dominance of spiders as predators of insects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees.
Huelsenbeck, J. P., & Ronquist, F. (2001) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.754 · Cited by 21,937
MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution.
Posada, D., & Crandall, K. A. (1998) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/14.9.817 · Cited by 19,820
(2009) · Cited by 6,571
A likelihood approach to estimating phylogeny from discrete morphological character data
Lewis, P. O. (2001) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/106351501753462876 · Cited by 2,929
Foelix, R. F. (1982) · Cited by 1,586
Systematics And Evolution Of Spiders (Araneae)
Coddington, J. (1991) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.22.1.565 · Cited by 784
Self-citationGosline, J. M., Denny, M. W., & DeMont, M. E. (1984) · Nature · doi:10.1038/309551a0 · Cited by 392
Lopardo, L., & Hormiga, G. (2008) · Cladistics · doi:10.1111/j.1096-0031.2007.00173.x · Cited by 325
Morphological phylogeny of cobweb spiders and their relatives (Araneae, Araneoidea, Theridiidae)
AGNARSSON, I. (2004) · Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.2004.00120.x · Cited by 298
Self-citationHedin, M. C., & Maddison, W. P. (2001) · Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution · doi:10.1006/mpev.2000.0883 · Cited by 264
Metadata
- Authors
- Blackledge, T. A., Scharff, N., Coddington, J. A., Szüts, T., Wenzel, J. W., Hayashi, C. Y., & Agnarsson, I.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2009-03-31
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 5229-5234
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2107158460
- Cited by
- 386
- References
- 34
- FWCI
- 14.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reconstructing web evolution and spider diversification in the molecular era. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0901377106
- The paper
- Blackledge, T. A., Scharff, N., Coddington, J. A., Szüts, T., Wenzel, J. W., Hayashi, C. Y., & Agnarsson, I. (2009). Reconstructing web evolution and spider diversification in the molecular era. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0901377106
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.