The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Restoring a maize root signal that attracts insect-killing nematodes to control a major pest
Open accessAbstract
When attacked by herbivorous insects, plants emit volatile compounds that attract natural enemies of the insects. It has been proposed that these volatile signals can be manipulated to improve crop protection. Here, we demonstrate the full potential of this strategy by restoring the emission of a specific belowground signal emitted by insect-damaged maize roots. The western corn rootworm induces the roots of many maize varieties to emit ( E )-β-caryophyllene, which attracts entomopathogenic nematodes that infect and kill the voracious root pest. However, most North American maize varieties have lost the ability to emit ( E )-β-caryophyllene and may therefore receive little protection from the nematodes. To restore the signal, a nonemitting maize line was transformed with a ( E )-β-caryophyllene synthase gene from oregano, resulting in constitutive emissions of this sesquiterpene. In rootworm-infested field plots in which nematodes were released, the ( E )-β-caryophyllene-emitting plants suffered significantly less root damage and had 60% fewer adult beetles emerge than untransformed, nonemitting lines. This demonstration that plant volatile emissions can be manipulated to enhance the effectiveness of biological control agents opens the way for novel and ecologically sound strategies to fight a variety of insect pests.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Transgenic crops expressing Bacillus thuringiensis toxins and biological control
Romeis, J., Meissle, M., & Bigler, F. (2006) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1180 · Cited by 719
Cited by
Chen, F., Tholl, D., Bohlmann, J., & Pichersky, E. (2011) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2011.04520.x · Cited by 1,446
The specificity of herbivore-induced plant volatiles in attracting herbivore enemies
Clavijo McCormick, A., Unsicker, S. B., & Gershenzon, J. (2012) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2012.03.012 · Cited by 566
Self-citationExplaining intraspecific diversity in plant secondary metabolites in an ecological context
Moore, B. D., Andrew, R. L., Külheim, C., & Foley, W. J. (2014) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.12526 · Cited by 533
Kant, M. R., Jonckheere, W., Knegt, B., Lemos, F., Liu, J., Schimmel, B. C. J., Villarroel, C. A., Ataide, L. M. S., Dermauw, W., Glas, J. J., et al. (2015) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcv054 · Cited by 360
Sites of synthesis, biochemistry and functional role of plant volatiles
Maffei, M. E. (2010) · South African Journal of Botany · doi:10.1016/j.sajb.2010.03.003 · Cited by 342
Metadata
- Authors
- Degenhardt, J., Hiltpold, I., Köllner, T. G., Frey, M., Gierl, A., Gershenzon, J., Hibbard, B. E., Ellersieck, M. R., & Turlings, T. C. J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2009-08-11
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 32
- Pages
- 13213-13218
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2097691925
- Cited by
- 363
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 31.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Restoring a maize root signal that attracts insect-killing nematodes to control a major pest. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0906365106
- The paper
- Degenhardt, J., Hiltpold, I., Köllner, T. G., Frey, M., Gierl, A., Gershenzon, J., Hibbard, B. E., Ellersieck, M. R., & Turlings, T. C. J. (2009). Restoring a maize root signal that attracts insect-killing nematodes to control a major pest. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0906365106
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.