The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Deceptive chemical signals induced by a plant virus attract insect vectors to inferior hosts
Open accessAbstract
Previous studies have shown that vector-borne pathogens can alter the phenotypes of their hosts and vectors in ways that influence the frequency and nature of interactions between them, with significant implications for the transmission and spread of disease. For insect-borne pathogens, host odors are particularly likely targets for manipulation, because both plant- and animal-feeding insects use volatile compounds derived from their hosts as key foraging cues. Here, we document the effects of a widespread plant pathogen, Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV), on the quality and attractiveness of one of its host plants ( Cucurbita pepo cv. Dixie) for two aphid vectors, Myzus persicae and Aphis gossypii . Our results indicate that CMV greatly reduces host-plant quality—aphids performed poorly on infected plants and rapidly emigrated from them—but increases the attractiveness of infected plants to aphids by inducing elevated emissions of a plant volatile blend otherwise similar to that emitted by healthy plants. Thus, CMV appears to attract vectors deceptively to infected plants from which they then disperse rapidly, a pattern highly conducive to the nonpersistent transmission mechanism employed by CMV and very different from the pattern previously reported for persistently transmitted viruses that require sustained aphid feeding for transmission. In addition to providing a documented example of a pathogen inducing a deceptive signal of host-plant quality to vectors, our results suggest that the transmission mechanism is a major factor shaping pathogen-induced changes in host-plant phenotypes. Furthermore, our findings yield a general hypothesis that, when vector-borne plant or animal pathogens reduce host quality for vectors, pathogen-induced changes in host phenotypes that enhance vector attraction frequently will involve the exaggeration of existing host-location cues.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Jiménez-Martínez, E. S., Bosque-Pérez, N. A., Berger, P. H., Zemetra, R. S., Ding, H., & Eigenbrode, S. D. (2004) · Environmental Entomology · doi:10.1603/0046-225x-33.5.1207 · Cited by 194
Cited by
Advanced methods of plant disease detection. A review
Martinelli, F., Scalenghe, R., Davino, S., Panno, S., Scuderi, G., Ruisi, P., Villa, P., Stroppiana, D., Boschetti, M., Goulart, L. R., et al. (2015) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-014-0246-1 · Cited by 964
Microbial Volatile Emissions as Insect Semiochemicals
Davis, T. S., Crippen, T. L., Hofstetter, R. W., & Tomberlin, J. K. (2013) · Journal of Chemical Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10886-013-0306-z · Cited by 470
Insect-Borne Plant Pathogens and Their Vectors: Ecology, Evolution, and Complex Interactions
Eigenbrode, S. D., Bosque-Pérez, N. A., & Davis, T. S. (2018) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev-ento-020117-043119 · Cited by 375
Metadata
- Authors
- Mauck, K. E., De Moraes, C. M., & Mescher, M. C.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2010-02-23
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 3600-3605
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1977281265
- Cited by
- 545
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 37.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deceptive chemical signals induced by a plant virus attract insect vectors to inferior hosts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0907191107
- The paper
- Mauck, K. E., De Moraes, C. M., & Mescher, M. C. (2010). Deceptive chemical signals induced by a plant virus attract insect vectors to inferior hosts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0907191107
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.