Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 506

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Structure, function, and self-assembly of single network gyroid ( I 4 1 32) photonic crystals in butterfly wing scales

Open access
Saranathan, Vinodkumar, Osuji, Chinedum O., Mochrie, Simon G. J., Noh, Heeso, Narayanan, Suresh, Sandy, Alec, Dufresne, Eric R., Prum, Richard O.·2010·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Complex three-dimensional biophotonic nanostructures produce the vivid structural colors of many butterfly wing scales, but their exact nanoscale organization is uncertain. We used small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) on single scales to characterize the 3D photonic nanostructures of five butterfly species from two families (Papilionidae, Lycaenidae). We identify these chitin and air nanostructures as single network gyroid ( I 4 1 32) photonic crystals. We describe their optical function from SAXS data and photonic band-gap modeling. Butterflies apparently grow these gyroid nanostructures by exploiting the self-organizing physical dynamics of biological lipid-bilayer membranes. These butterfly photonic nanostructures initially develop within scale cells as a core-shell double gyroid ( Ia3d ), as seen in block-copolymer systems, with a pentacontinuous volume comprised of extracellular space, cell plasma membrane, cellular cytoplasm, smooth endoplasmic reticulum (SER) membrane, and intra-SER lumen. This double gyroid nanostructure is subsequently transformed into a single gyroid network through the deposition of chitin in the extracellular space and the degeneration of the rest of the cell. The butterflies develop the thermodynamically favored double gyroid precursors as a route to the optically more efficient single gyroid nanostructures. Current approaches to photonic crystal engineering also aim to produce single gyroid motifs. The biologically derived photonic nanostructures characterized here may offer a convenient template for producing optical devices based on biomimicry or direct dielectric infiltration.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0909616107

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Metadata

Authors
Saranathan, V., Osuji, C. O., Mochrie, S. G. J., Noh, H., Narayanan, S., Sandy, A., Dufresne, E. R., & Prum, R. O.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2010-06-14
Volume
107
Issue
26
Pages
11676-11681
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2097584792
Cited by
506
References
0
FWCI
13.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Structure, function, and self-assembly of single network gyroid ( I 4 1 32) photonic crystals in butterfly wing scales. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0909616107
The paper
Saranathan, V., Osuji, C. O., Mochrie, S. G. J., Noh, H., Narayanan, S., Sandy, A., Dufresne, E. R., & Prum, R. O. (2010). Structure, function, and self-assembly of single network gyroid ( I 4 1 32) photonic crystals in butterfly wing scales. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0909616107

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.