The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Message-passing algorithms for compressed sensing
Open accessAbstract
Compressed sensing aims to undersample certain high-dimensional signals yet accurately reconstruct them by exploiting signal characteristics. Accurate reconstruction is possible when the object to be recovered is sufficiently sparse in a known basis. Currently, the best known sparsity–undersampling tradeoff is achieved when reconstructing by convex optimization, which is expensive in important large-scale applications. Fast iterative thresholding algorithms have been intensively studied as alternatives to convex optimization for large-scale problems. Unfortunately known fast algorithms offer substantially worse sparsity–undersampling tradeoffs than convex optimization. We introduce a simple costless modification to iterative thresholding making the sparsity–undersampling tradeoff of the new algorithms equivalent to that of the corresponding convex optimization procedures. The new iterative-thresholding algorithms are inspired by belief propagation in graphical models. Our empirical measurements of the sparsity–undersampling tradeoff for the new algorithms agree with theoretical calculations. We show that a state evolution formalism correctly derives the true sparsity–undersampling tradeoff. There is a surprising agreement between earlier calculations based on random convex polytopes and this apparently very different theoretical formalism.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Boyd, S., Parikh, N., Chu, E., Peleato, B., & Eckstein, J. (2011) · Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning · doi:10.1561/2200000016 · Cited by 17,075
Phase Retrieval via Wirtinger Flow: Theory and Algorithms
Candès, E. J., Li, X., & Soltanolkotabi, M. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2015.2399924 · Cited by 1,049
ReconNet: Non-Iterative Reconstruction of Images from Compressively Sensed Measurements
Kulkarni, K., Lohit, S., Turaga, P., Kerviche, R., & Ashok, A. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.55 · Cited by 768
Massive Connectivity With Massive MIMO—Part I: Device Activity Detection and Channel Estimation
Liu, L., & Yu, W. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tsp.2018.2818082 · Cited by 686
Federated Learning Over Wireless Fading Channels
Amiri, M. M., & Gunduz, D. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · doi:10.1109/twc.2020.2974748 · Cited by 625
Metadata
- Authors
- Donoho, D. L., Maleki, A., & Montanari, A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2009-11-10
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 45
- Pages
- 18914-18919
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2082029531
- Cited by
- 2,416
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 69.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Message-passing algorithms for compressed sensing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0909892106
- The paper
- Donoho, D. L., Maleki, A., & Montanari, A. (2009). Message-passing algorithms for compressed sensing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0909892106
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.